Avendano-Herrera v. USA
Jose Fernando Avendano-Herrera |
United States of America |
5:2018cv01163 |
November 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Charles Goodwin |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
|
Filing 8 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Signed by direction of Honorable Charles Goodwin on 11/29/18. (kmt) |
Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #8 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge to: Jose Fernando Avendano-Herrera #56386-177 BOP Great Plains CI P.O. Box 400 Hinton, OK 73047 (kmt) |
Filing 7 NO PREVIOUS Cases (kmt) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 3:18-cv-02748. |
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Nov 27 16:53:36 CST 2018 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 11/28/2018.] |
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Oct 22 12:29:06 CDT 2018 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 11/28/2018.] |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Oct 18 10:00:15 CDT 2018 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 11/28/2018.] |
Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jose Fernando Avendano-Herrera. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 11/28/2018.] |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 11/28/2018.] |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 11/28/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Avendano-Herrera v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jose Fernando Avendano-Herrera | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.