Lott v. Oklahoma City City of et al
Plaintiff: Sylvia Lott
Defendant: Oklahoma City City of, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and Bruce Davis
Case Number: 5:2018cv01176
Filed: December 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Stephen P Friot
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses to #6 MOTION to Dismiss, #8 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 2/8/2019. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 1/29/2019. (llg)
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss , #8 MOTION to Dismiss by Sylvia Lott. (D'Antonio, Cynthia)
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Moore, Michael)
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 (STRICKEN) ANSWER to Complaint by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.(Moore, Michael) Modified on 1/11/2019 (llg).
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Docket Annotation: #10 ANSWER to Complaint by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is STRICKEN, as it has been superseded by the Answer at doc. no. 11. (llg)
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order NOTICE from the Court re #11 Answer to Complaint by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Counsel for AFSCME Local 2406 is DIRECTED, in future filings, to comply with the court's ECF Policies & Procedures Manual, Section II.A.4.a. - "Exhibits... shall be clearly labeled with the appropriate exhibit number.... Do not use alphabetical or alpha-numeric designations for exhibits. A description [more than just the exhibit no.] of the numbered exhibit must be provided in the docket entry...." Failure to comply in the future may result in filings being stricken. (llg)
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #8 MOTION to Dismiss by Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his individual capacity), Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his official Capacity). (Moore, Michael)
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his individual capacity), Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his official Capacity). (Moore, Michael)
January 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Oklahoma City City of.(Mahoney, Richard)
January 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Oklahoma City City of. (Logan, Brett)
January 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Richard E Mahoney on behalf of Oklahoma City City of (Mahoney, Richard)
January 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Brett M Logan on behalf of Oklahoma City City of (Logan, Brett)
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael J Moore on behalf of American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his individual capacity), Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his official Capacity) (Moore, Michael)
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his individual capacity), Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his official Capacity), Oklahoma City City of. (kr)
December 4, 2018 Opinion or Order PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-2823078. (D'Antonio, Cynthia)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his individual capacity), Bruce Davis(AFSCME President in his official Capacity), Oklahoma City City of filed by Sylvia Lott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lott v. Oklahoma City City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma City City of
Represented By: Brett M Logan
Represented By: Richard E Mahoney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Represented By: Michael J Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Davis
Represented By: Michael J Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sylvia Lott
Represented By: Cynthia Rowe D'Antonio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?