Thomas v. Hormel et al
| Jonathan R Thomas |
| FNU Boynston, Rick Whitten, W Clay, Jeffery Trout, Dan Grogan, Betsy Hormel, C Payne, Joe Allbaugh and Willienell Bryant-Pitts |
| 5:2018cv01256 |
| December 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Joe Heaton |
| Bernard M Jones |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER ~ The Court granted Plaintiff in forma pauperis status, #6 , and received his initial $12.37 payment on February 7, 2019. #7 . Plaintiff's #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones on 2/12/2019. (dwl)
|
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT by Jonathan R Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nv) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan R Thomas. Motions referred to Bernard M. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nv) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO AGENCY HAVING CUSTODY OF PLAINTIFF FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE ~ The Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in this action without prepayment of the filing fee and directed him to pay an initial filing fee of $12.37, and to make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding months income credited to his prison account until he has paid the total filing fee of $350.00. Officials at JCCC are now directed to collect the monthly payments when Plaintiffs prisoner account exceeds $10.00 and forward them to the Clerk of this Court until the filing fee is paid in full. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones on 2/8/2019.
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE AND SPECIAL REPORT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones on 2/8/2019. (dwl)
|
| Filing 7 Receipt for Money Received from Jonathan R Thomas in the amount of $12.37, receipt number OKW500072273 regarding #1 Complaint, balance remaining on Complaint is $337.63. Receipt mailed to payor. (nv) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ~ Granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. the Court finds Plaintiff is entitled to proceed without full prepayment of the filing fee, and his Application is granted. However, Plaintiff shall be required to pay the full $350 filing fee as set forth. Plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $12.37 which represents 20% of the greater of the (1) average monthly deposits, or (2) average monthly balance in Plaintiff's prison account(s) for the approximate six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to his prison account(s) until he has paid the total fee of $350. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones on 1/22/2019. (dwl)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan R Thomas. Motions referred to Bernard M. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nv) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES ~ Plaintiff shall cure the deficiencies no later than January 25, 2019. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones on 1/4/2019. (dwl)
|
| Filing 3 Enter ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones. Entered at the direction of Honorable Joe Heaton on 12/26/18. (nv) |
| Filing 2 PREVIOUS Cases. (nv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jonathan R Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1- Supporting Facts Info, #2 Attachment 2- Affidavit and Supporting Facts, #3 Attachment 3 - Supporting Fact No. 1 - Certificate of Live Birth, #4 Attachment 4 - Supporting Fact No. 2 - Request to Staff, #5 Attachment 5 - Supporting Fact No. 3 - Request to Staff and ODOC Report, #6 Attachment 6- Supporting Fact No. 4 - Request to Staff, #7 Attachment 7-Supporting Fact No. 5 - ODOC Report, #8 Attachment 8-Supporting Fact No. 6 - ODOC Report, #9 Attachment 9-Supporting Fact No. 7 - Patient Labs, #10 Attachment 10-Supporting Fact No. 8 - Request to Staff, #11 Attachment 11-Supporting Fact No. 9 - Segregation Review, #12 Attachment 12-Supporting Fact No. 10- Request to Staff, #13 Attachment 13-Supporting Fact No. 11- Request to Staff Response, #14 Attachment 14-Supporting Fact No. 12- Request to Staff Response, #15 Attachment 15-Supporting Fact No. 13- Request to Staff, #16 Attachment 16-Supporting Fact No. 14- Inmate Offender Grievance, #17 Attachment 17-Supporting Fact No. 15 - Return of Request to Staff, #18 Attachment 18-Supporting Fact No. 16 - Inmate Offender Grievance, #19 Attachment 19-Supporting Fact No. 17 and 18 - Return of Request to Staff, #20 Attachment 20-Supporting Fact No. 19-Inmate Offender Grievance, #21 Attachment 21-Supporting Fact No. 20 - ODOC Medical Progress Report, #22 Attachment 22-Supporting Fact No. 21 - ODOC Progress Note, #23 Attachment 23-Supporting Fact No. 22 -Surgical Pathology Report, #24 Attachment Supporting Fact No. 24- ODOC Progress Note, #25 Attachment 25-Supporting Fact No. 24 and 25- Request to Staff, #26 Attachment 26-Supporting Fact No. 26- Request to Staff, #27 Attachment 27-Supporting Fact No. 27-ODOC Progress Note, #28 Attachment Supporting Fact No. 28- ODOC Progress Note, #29 Attachment 29-Supporting Fact No. 29-Grievance Decision from Reviewing Auth, #30 Attachment 30-Supporting Fact No. 34 - ODOC Progress Note, #31 Civil Cover Sheet, #32 Envelope) (nv). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
