Addison v. Radke et al
Plaintiff: Jonathon Dana Addison
Defendant: Officer FNU De La Torre, Officer FNU O'Kelley and Officer FNU Radke
Case Number: 5:2019cv00033
Filed: January 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Shon T Erwin
Referring Judge: Charles Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- it is recommended that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's Order. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned magistrate judge in the captioned matter Objections to R&R due by 3/1/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 2/12/2019. (mc)
February 12, 2019 Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc)
January 24, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE (other) by Jonathon Dana Addison (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES -- The Court is in receipt of the documents Plaintiff tendered in this matter. However, the documents are deficient as indicated. Plaintiff shall cure the deficiencies designated above by February 1, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 1/15/19. (mc)
January 14, 2019 Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin.Signed by the direction of Honorable Charles Goodwin on 1/14/19. (kmt)
January 14, 2019 Filing 3 NO PREVIOUS Cases (kmt)
January 14, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathon Dana Addison. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt)
January 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU De La Torre(individually), FNU De La Torre(in official capacity), FNU O'Kelley(individually), FNU O'Kelley(in official capacity), FNU Radke(in official capacity), FNU Radke(Individually) filed by Jonathon Dana Addison. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt)
January 14, 2019 Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, #4 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, #1 Complaint to: Jonathon Dana Addison ARAPAHO-CCJ P O Box 40 Arapaho, OK 73620 (kmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Addison v. Radke et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer FNU De La Torre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer FNU O'Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer FNU Radke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathon Dana Addison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?