Nelson et al v. General Motors LLC et al
Taquanta Reeves Embery and Deonn Nelson |
Kimberlynn Bates and General Motors LLC |
5:2019cv00053 |
January 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Stephen P Friot |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE . (Teague, J) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by General Motors LLC.(Teague, J) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - LLC by General Motors LLC . (Teague, J) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Linda G Kaufmann on behalf of General Motors LLC (Kaufmann, Linda) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by J Derrick Teague on behalf of General Motors LLC (Teague, J) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Oklahoma County District Court, case number CJ-2018-4178 filed by General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Petition, #2 Exhibit 2 - Signed Affidavit; Kimberlynn Bates 1.15.19, #3 Exhibit 3 - Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4 - Proof of Non-Service, #5 Exhibit 5 - Proof Of Service Kimberlynn Bates, #6 Exhibit 6 - Proof of Service General Motors, #7 Exhibit 7 - Motion to Associate Counsel, #8 Exhibit 8 - Order Admitting to Practice, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(ac) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-2849010. (Teague, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.