Davis v. Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Davis
Defendant: Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital
Case Number: 5:2019cv00561
Filed: June 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Timothy D DeGiusti
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 REPLY by Defendant Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital re #9 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support filed by Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Charge of Discrimination)(Grose, Justin)
July 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support filed by Elizabeth Davis. (Turner, Joshua)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit 2 - Dismissal and Right to Sue)(Grose, Justin)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Eugene K Bertman on behalf of Elizabeth Davis (Bertman, Eugene)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Elizabeth Davis. (Turner, Joshua)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Joshua S Turner on behalf of Elizabeth Davis (Turner, Joshua)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for a One-Week Extension ofTime to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Answer due 7/3/2019. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 6/26/19. (kmt)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital. (Grose, Justin)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Justin P Grose on behalf of Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital (Grose, Justin)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Samuel R Fulkerson on behalf of Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital (Fulkerson, Samuel)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-2945368. (Fulkerson, Samuel)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-2019-2795 filed by Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Docket, #2 Exhibit 2 - Petition (Mercy), #3 Exhibit 3 - Summons mercy, #4 Exhibit 4 - Envelope, #5 Exhibit 5 - Entry of Appearance of Joshua S. Turner, #6 Exhibit 6 - State Court Notice, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital
Represented By: Samuel R Fulkerson
Represented By: Justin P Grose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Davis
Represented By: Joshua S Turner
Represented By: Eugene K Bertman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?