Goad v. Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma
Nathan J Goad |
Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma and Steven Hansen |
5:2019cv00562 |
June 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Patrick R Wyrick |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by All Defendants.(Mann, Richard) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Lexie P Norwood on behalf of All Defendants (Norwood, Lexie) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Richard N Mann on behalf of Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma(as governing board of the University of Central Oklahoma), Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma(the State of Oklahoma ex rel), Steven Hansen (Mann, Richard) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma(as governing board of the University of Central Oklahoma), Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma(the State of Oklahoma ex rel), Steven Hansen. (kmt) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-2945806. (Bowers, Barrett) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma filed by Nathan J Goad. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.