Holmes v. GPM Southeast LLC
| Audrey L Holmes |
| GPM Southeast LLC |
| 5:2019cv00684 |
| July 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Stephen P Friot |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER ADOPTING #6 Report and Recommendation, GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Audrey L Holmes. Plf is DIRECTED to pay $25.00 on or before the 1st day of each month until the $400.00 filing fee is paid in full. Failure of plf to pay the filing fee as directed by the court may result in plf's complaint & action being dismissed pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk of the court shall not issue process until at least $100.00 of the $400.00 filing fee has been paid by plf. The clerk of the court shall notify the court when at least $100.00 has been paid by plf. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 9/10/2019. (llg)
|
| Filing 7 Receipt for Money Received from Audrey L Holmes in the amount of $25.00, receipt number OKW500075878 regarding #1 Complaint. Remaining balance $375.00. (ac) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Audrey L Holmes. The undersigned recommends the court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Objections to R&R due by 9/9/2019. This terminates the referral in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 8/19/19. (lb) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Audrey L Holmes. (rb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER regarding #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must supplement her application on or before 8/18/19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 7/29/19. (lb)
|
| Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Audrey L Holmes Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. by direction of Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 7/29/2019. (sr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Audrey L Holmes. (ac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GPM Southeast LLC filed by Audrey L Holmes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit 2- Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holmes v. GPM Southeast LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Audrey L Holmes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GPM Southeast LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
