Johnson v. United States of America
Petitioner: Timothy Edmun Johnson
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 5:2019cv00891
Filed: September 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Charles Goodwin
Referring Judge: Gary M Purcell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2019 Filing 9 OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #8 filed by Timothy Edmun Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ank)
October 29, 2019 Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : It is recommended this action re Doc #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine. Objections to R&R due by 11/18/2019. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter, and any pending motion not specifically addressed herein.Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 10/29/2019. (cps)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 10/29/2019. (cps)
October 29, 2019 Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell no longer assigned to case. (cps)
October 28, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Timothy Edmun Johnson. Motions referred to Gary M. Purcell. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ank)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO PETITIONER TO CURE DEFICIENCY. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner shall cure the deficiencies designated above by the 4th day of November, 2019. Otherwise, the Court will recommend dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 10/17/2019. (cps)
September 25, 2019 Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Signed by direction of the Honorable Charles Goodwin on 09/25/2019. (ank)
September 25, 2019 Filing 3 PREVIOUS Cases. (ank)
September 25, 2019 Filing 2 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Timothy Edmun Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - May 18, 2018 Letter from Public Defender, #2 Envelope)(ank)
September 25, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Timothy Edmun Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ank)
September 25, 2019 Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, and documents #1 , #2 , and #4 to Timothy Edmun Johnson #31609-064 EL RENO-FCI P O Box 1500 El Reno, OK 73036. Placed (1) additional copy (each) of Petition and Brief in prisoner folder. (ank)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Edmun Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?