Miskell v. Duncan Public Schools et al
Plaintiff: Mary Beth Miskell
Defendant: Duncan Public Schools Board of Education and Duncan Public Schools
Case Number: 5:2019cv01073
Filed: November 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Joe Heaton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER plaintiff's second motion for extension of deadline #8 is granted...plaintiff shall file her response to defendant's motion to dismiss #4 not later than 01/22/2020. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 01/15/2020. (lam)
January 14, 2020 Filing 8 SECOND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 MOTION to Dismiss With Combined Brief in Support by All Plaintiffs. (Gillett, Nichole)
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER plaintiff's unopposed motion for extension of deadline; plaintiff shall file her response to defendant's motion to dismiss #4 not later than 01/15/2019. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 12/17/2019. (lam)
December 12, 2019 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Nichole Moisant Gillett on behalf of Mary Beth Miskell (Gillett, Nichole) Modified on 12/17/2019 to replace Main Document, due to lack of signature by counsel (nv).
December 12, 2019 Filing 5 FIRST MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 MOTION to Dismiss With Combined Brief in Support by All Plaintiffs. (Gillett, Nichole) Modified on 12/17/2019 to replace Main Document, due to lack of signature by counsel
November 21, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss With Combined Brief in Support by Duncan Public Schools. (Richardson, Jerry)
November 21, 2019 Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Kent B Rainey on behalf of Duncan Public Schools (Rainey, Kent)
November 21, 2019 Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Jerry A Richardson on behalf of Duncan Public Schools (Richardson, Jerry)
November 21, 2019 PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-3040853. (Richardson, Jerry)
November 20, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Stephens County District Court, case number CJ-2019-82 filed by Duncan Public Schools. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit 2 - Petition, #3 Exhibit 3 - Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(nv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miskell v. Duncan Public Schools et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duncan Public Schools Board of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duncan Public Schools
Represented By: Kent B Rainey
Represented By: Jerry A Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Beth Miskell
Represented By: Nichole Moisant Gillett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?