Woods et al v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc et al
Timothy Woods and Susan Woods |
American Bottling Company, The, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, American International Group, Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation, Splash Transport Inc, Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc and Jeffrey Eugene Lupp |
5:2019cv01162 |
December 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Timothy D DeGiusti |
Stephen P Friot |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 REPLY by Plaintiffs Susan Woods, Timothy Woods re #33 MOTION to Remand to State Court , #40 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Deligans, R) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting #48 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Reply to Defendant The American Bottling Company's Opposition to #33 Plaintiffs' MOTION to Remand Out of Time. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 2/10/2020. (llg) |
Filing 48 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #33 MOTION to Remand to State Court by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs Reply In Support of Motion to Remand)(Deligans, R) |
Filing 47 CONVENTIONALLY FILED EXHIBIT #45 Exhibit 1, 12/16/2019 Service Video and Exhibit 2, 1/8/2020 Service Video by Plaintiffs Susan Woods, Timothy Woods. (ac) |
Filing 46 ORDER denying as moot #24 Motion of Defendants Keurig Dr. Pepper and Splash to Consolidate Similar Actions. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 2/10/2020. (llg) |
Filing 45 NOTICE of Conventional Filing of Exhibit 1 & 2 of Doc. #44 by R Ryan Deligans on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Deligans, R) |
Filing 44 RESPONSE in Opposition re #42 MOTION to Strike #38 Response in Opposition to Motion, and Brief in Support filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 12.16.2019 Service Video to be filed conventionally, #2 Exhibit 2 - 01.08.2020 Service Video to be filed conventionally)(Deligans, R) |
Filing 43 REPLY to Response to Motion re #25 MOTION to Quash /Defendants' 12(b)(5) Motion to Quash Service for Insufficient Service of Process for Defendant Lupp filed by American Bottling Company, The, Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Splash Transport Inc. (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 42 MOTION to Strike #38 Response in Opposition to Motion, and Brief in Support by American Bottling Company, The. (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 41 REPLY to Response to Motion re #24 MOTION to Consolidate Cases /Motion of Defendants Keurig Dr Pepper and Splash to Consolidate Similar Actions and Brief in Support filed by Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Splash Transport Inc. (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 40 RESPONSE in Opposition re #33 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by American Bottling Company, The. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of William E. Reid, #2 Exhibit 2019-06-20 Email from Reid to Deligans, #3 Exhibit 2019-08-01 letter from Deligans to Reid, #4 Exhibit 2019-12-11 lf Oklahoma Insurance Dept to the Ins Co of Pennsylvania)(Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 39 RESPONSE to Motion re #24 MOTION to Consolidate Cases /Motion of Defendants Keurig Dr Pepper and Splash to Consolidate Similar Actions and Brief in Support filed by All Plaintiffs. (Deligans, R) |
Filing 38 RESPONSE in Opposition re #25 MOTION to Quash /Defendants' 12(b)(5) Motion to Quash Service for Insufficient Service of Process for Defendant Lupp filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Non-Service, #2 Exhibit 2 - Affidavit of Service)(Deligans, R) |
Filing 37 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Jeffrey Eugene Lupp.(Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 36 ENTRY of Appearance by J Derek Cowan on behalf of Jeffrey Eugene Lupp (Cowan, J) |
Filing 35 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas A Paruolo on behalf of Jeffrey Eugene Lupp (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 34 ENTRY of Appearance by William E Reid on behalf of American Bottling Company, The, Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Jeffrey Eugene Lupp, Splash Transport Inc (Reid, William) |
Filing 33 MOTION to Remand to State Court by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Accident Report, #2 Exhibit 2 - 12/06/19 Email to Process Server, #3 Exhibit 3 - 12/09/19 Letter to Reid, #4 Exhibit 4 - 12/06/19 Letter to OID, #5 Exhibit 5 - Affidavit of Non-Service, #6 Exhibit 6 - Affidavit of Service, #7 Exhibit 7 - 12/30/19 Letter to Reid & Paruolo)(Deligans, R) |
Filing 32 ENTRY of Appearance by R Ryan Deligans on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Deligans, R) |
Filing 31 ENTRY of Appearance by Andrew M Gunn on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Gunn, Andrew) |
Filing 30 ENTRY of Appearance by Mark E Bialick on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Bialick, Mark) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting #26 Defendants' Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of William E Reid. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 1/10/2020. (llg) |
Filing 28 Receipt for Money Received in the amount of $50.00, receipt number OKW500078040 regarding #26 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for William E Reid (ac) |
Filing 27 SUPPLEMENT re #25 MOTION to Quash /Defendants' 12(b)(5) Motion to Quash Service for Insufficient Service of Process for Defendant Lupp by American Bottling Company, The, Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Splash Transport Inc. (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 26 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by American Bottling Company, The, Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Splash Transport Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Request for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Paruolo, Thomas) |
NOTICE from the Court re #26 Defendants' MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission of William E. Reid. The motion will be considered once defense counsel has paid the required $50 pro hac vice fee and once defense counsel has submitted a proposed order for said motion.(llg) |
Filing 25 MOTION to Quash /Defendants' 12(b)(5) Motion to Quash Service for Insufficient Service of Process for Defendant Lupp by American Bottling Company, The, Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Splash Transport Inc. (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 24 MOTION to Consolidate Cases /Motion of Defendants Keurig Dr Pepper and Splash to Consolidate Similar Actions and Brief in Support by Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Splash Transport Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Oklahoma Traffic Collision Report)(Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 23 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation . (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 22 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc . (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 21 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania . (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 20 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Splash Transport Inc . (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 19 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by American Bottling Company, The . (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 18 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by American Bottling Company, The, Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Splash Transport Inc. (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 17 ENTRY of Appearance by J Derek Cowan on behalf of Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation (Cowan, J) |
Filing 16 ENTRY of Appearance by J Derek Cowan on behalf of Splash Transport Inc (Cowan, J) |
Filing 15 ENTRY of Appearance by J Derek Cowan on behalf of Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc (Cowan, J) |
Filing 14 ENTRY of Appearance by J Derek Cowan on behalf of Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (Cowan, J) |
Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas A Paruolo on behalf of Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas A Paruolo on behalf of Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas A Paruolo on behalf of Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas A Paruolo on behalf of Splash Transport Inc (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania.(Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc.(Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Splash Transport Inc.(Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Dr Pepper/7-Up Corporation.(Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by American Bottling Company, The.(Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable Stephen P. Friot for all further proceedings. Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti no longer assigned to case. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 12/17/2019. (mb) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by J Derek Cowan on behalf of American Bottling Company, The (Cowan, J) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas A Paruolo on behalf of American Bottling Company, The (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Cleveland County, case number CJ-2019-1549 filed by American Bottling Company, The. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 2019-12-02 Petition, #2 Exhibit 2 - 2019-12-02 Entry of Appearance, #3 Exhibit 3 - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4 - Declaration of Jill Smith, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-3055946. (Paruolo, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.