Prestige Manufacturing Company LLC v. Gault
| Prestige Manufacturing Company LLC |
| Tom Gault |
| 5:2020cv00056 |
| January 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| David L Russell |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: granting #7 Motion to Remand, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 3/3/20. (jw)
|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Remand filed by Prestige Manufacturing Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Assignment, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 - Warranty Deed, #4 Exhibit Ex. 4 - Bill, #5 Exhibit Ex. 5 - SOS)(McCormick, Evan) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Remand filed by Tom Gault. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Johnson Address - TX Corporate Business Filings, #2 Exhibit 2 Johnson Address - TX Corporate Business Filings, #3 Exhibit 3 Johnson Address - Texas Franchise Tax Public Info Report, #4 Exhibit 4 Johnson Address - IRS)(Sullenger, Erin) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: granting #8 Motion to Stay Case; this case shall be stayed pending ruling on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand #7 . Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 2/6/20. (jw)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Case by Prestige Manufacturing Company LLC. (McCormick, Evan) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand by Prestige Manufacturing Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Disclosure, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 - Affidavit, #4 Exhibit Ex. 4 - Order, #5 Exhibit Ex. 5 - Friess v. Cherokee)(McCormick, Evan) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - LLC by Prestige Manufacturing Company LLC . (McCormick, Evan) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Evan A McCormick on behalf of Prestige Manufacturing Company LLC (McCormick, Evan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Brief in Support by Tom Gault. (Sullenger, Erin) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Erin P Sullenger on behalf of Tom Gault (Sullenger, Erin) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by L Mark Walker on behalf of Tom Gault (Walker, L) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Pottawatomie County, case number CJ-2019-506 filed by Tom Gault. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Petition, #2 Exhibit 2 - Motion, #3 Exhibit 3 - Order, #4 Exhibit 4 - Docket Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-3077349. (Walker, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Prestige Manufacturing Company LLC v. Gault | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tom Gault | |
| Represented By: | L Mark Walker |
| Represented By: | Erin P Sullenger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Prestige Manufacturing Company LLC | |
| Represented By: | Evan A McCormick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
