Cronkite v. Oklahoma Attorney General
Plaintiff: Terry Cronkite
Defendant: Oklahoma Attorney General
Case Number: 5:2020cv00250
Filed: March 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Scott L Palk
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SURREPLY re #10 Order on Motion for Leave to, #7 Response in Opposition to Motion to dismiss filed by Terry Cronkite. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email RE: Sovereign Immunity)(Hurst, Amber)
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. Plaintiff shall file a Sur-Reply not to exceed 7 pages on or before April 29, 2020. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 4/27/2020. (md)
April 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Partial Opposition to Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss by All Plaintiffs. (Hurst, Amber)
April 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REPLY by Defendant Oklahoma Attorney General re #7 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Oklahoma Attorney General. (Albert, Victor)
April 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support filed by Terry Cronkite. (Hurst, Amber)
March 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by All Plaintiffs. (Hurst, Amber)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Oklahoma Attorney General.(Albert, Victor)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by Oklahoma Attorney General. (Albert, Victor)
March 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Receipt for Money Received from Oklahoma Attorney General in the amount of $400.00, receipt number 1087-3122766 regarding #1 Notice of Removal, (rb)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Justin P Grose on behalf of Oklahoma Attorney General (Grose, Justin)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Victor F Albert on behalf of Oklahoma Attorney General (Albert, Victor)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-2020-695 filed by Oklahoma Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Petition, #2 Exhibit 2 - Proof of Service, #3 Exhibit - State Court Docket, #4 Exhibit 4 - EOA - Amber Hurst, #5 Exhibit 5 - EOA - Brandon Roberts, #6 Exhibit 6 - EOA - Mark Hammons, #7 Exhibit 7 - State Court Notice, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(rb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cronkite v. Oklahoma Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma Attorney General
Represented By: Victor F Albert
Represented By: Justin P Grose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry Cronkite
Represented By: Amber L Hurst
Represented By: Mark E Hammons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?