Chesapeake Operating LLC v. CC Forbes LLC
| Chesapeake Operating LLC |
| CC Forbes LLC |
| 5:2020cv00557 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| David L Russell |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss by CC Forbes LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Milanovich v. Chesapeake Petition)(Tucker, John) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, CC Forbes LLC answer due 8/7/2020.. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 7/24/20. (jw)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #7 Amended Complaint by CC Forbes LLC. (Tucker, John) |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - LLC by CC Forbes LLC . (Tucker, John) |
| IMPORTANT NOTICE: The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (OKWD) is upgrading its current CM/ECF system to the Next Generation of CM/ECF (NextGen CM/ECF) on Monday, August 3, 2020. Complete information regarding the OKWD NextGen CM/ECF implementation is available at #http://www.okwd.uscourts.gov/nextgen-information.****Currently, you may share a single PACER account with other attorneys in your firm. With the new OKWD NextGen CM/ECF system, sharing of individual PACER accounts is prohibited. You must have an individual upgraded PACER account linked to your e-filing account. Once again, shared PACER accounts cannot be used by OKWD e-filing attorneys. ****Preparing for NextGen CM/ECF is a two-step process. Step one is to upgrade your PACER account and step two is to link your upgraded PACER account to the OKWD e-filing account in the upgraded NextGen CM/ECF system. This notice only addresses the first step because the second step cannot be completed until on or after August 3, 2020. ****Many PACER accounts have already been upgraded. The first step is to determine whether you have an "Upgraded" PACER account. If any of the following is true, you have an upgraded PACER account and no action is required until after the OKWD NextGen CM/ECF upgrade on August 3, 2020: 1) You have an upgraded PACER account for another NextGen court or 2) Your PACER account was created after August 10, 2014. If neither of these is true, you must upgrade your legacy PACER account before you can link your PACER account to your new NextGen CM/ECF account. ****OKWDs current CM/ECF system will NOT be available from 11:00 AM on 07/31/20 until 8:00 AM on 08/03/20 due to the upgrade. ****Additional notices will be sent at a later date regarding the second step of this process. If you have questions, please contact the PACER Service Center at 800-676-6856 or the OKWD Clerk's Office CM/ECF Help Desk at 405-609-5555. (Pigott, William) (ADI) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER denied as moot #6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 7/14/20. (jw)
|
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - LLC by Chesapeake Operating LLC . (Bradford, Reagan) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Chesapeake Operating LLC . (Bradford, Reagan) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CC Forbes LLC filed by Chesapeake Operating LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- MSA, #2 Exhibit 2- MCA, #3 Exhibit 3- Maldanado Petitions, #4 Exhibit 4- Chesapeake Demands)(Bradford, Reagan) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by CC Forbes LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Michelle White)(Tucker, John) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Austin T Jackson on behalf of CC Forbes LLC (Jackson, Austin) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CC Forbes LLC. (Tucker, John) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by John H Tucker on behalf of CC Forbes LLC (Tucker, John) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CC Forbes LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, - Amended Notice of Removal - (Tucker, John) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-3173509. (Tucker, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-2020-1747 filed by CC Forbes LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Docket Sheet as of 6-12-20, #2 Exhibit 2 - 04-2-20 - Petition, #3 Exhibit 3 - 4-28-20 - Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record, #4 Exhibit 4 - 5-21-20 - Order permitting Motion to Withdraw, #5 Exhibit 5 - 6-11-20 - Special Entry of Appearance, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chesapeake Operating LLC v. CC Forbes LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CC Forbes LLC | |
| Represented By: | John H Tucker |
| Represented By: | Austin T Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chesapeake Operating LLC | |
| Represented By: | Reagan E Bradford |
| Represented By: | Ryan K Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
