Davis v. Doe et al
| Lonnie Bernard Davis |
| FNU Shaffer, John Doe, D Holston and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 5:2020cv00575 |
| June 16, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Robin J Cauthron |
| Gary M Purcell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Motions referred to Gary M. Purcell.Entered at the direction of the Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 6/16/2020. (rb) |
| Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable Robin J. Cauthron for all further proceedings. Honorable Scott L. Palk no longer assigned to case. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Scott L. Palk on 6/16/2020. (rb) |
| Filing 4 PREVIOUS Cases (rb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lonnie Bernard Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rb) |
| Filing 2 BRIEF IN SUPPORT Titled "Freedom of Information Act Lawsuit" by Lonnie Bernard Davis. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1- FOIA Request, #2 Attachment 2- FOIA Appeal Response, #3 Envelope)(rb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Lonnie Bernard Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- E-mail Record, #2 Exhibit 2- Discipline Hearing Report, #3 Envelope)(rb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
