Russell et al v. Farmers Insurance Company Inc et al
| Candi Russell and Bruce Russell |
| Casey Martin and Farmers Insurance Company Inc |
| 5:2020cv00607 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Jodi W Dishman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Jonathan M Irwin on behalf of Bruce Russell, Candi Russell (Irwin, Jonathan) |
| Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN by Plaintiffs Bruce Russell, Candi Russell. (Tabor, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Tabor, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 10 ENTER ORDER. Upon review of Plaintiffs' Response to the Notice of Removal Doc. No. #9 , after Farmers Insurance Company Inc.'s removal to federal court on June 24, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a dismissal of defendant Casey Martin in state court. The Court orders that any filing purporting to dismiss defendant Casey Martin must be filed in this Court as a federal-court filing that conforms with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 41. See 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) (after removal "the State court shall proceed no further unless and until the case is remanded"); cf. LCvR81.2(b) (stating that the court may require that any motion, response, reply, or other paper be refiled in conformity with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon the removal of an action to federal court). The parties are currently scheduled for a status and scheduling conference on August 26, 2020. This conference will be stricken unless a dismissal of Casey Martin is filed consistent with this Order by August 10, 2020. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 08/03/2020. (nv) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE re #1 Notice of Removal and Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 7-23-20 Dismissal of Casey Martin (Payne County Case No. CJ-2020-172))(Tabor, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 8 STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET: Scheduling Conference set for 8/26/2020 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 502 before the Honorable Jodi W. Dishman. Status Report due by 8/18/2020. (nv) |
| NOTICE from the Court #7 Response, STRICKEN due to counsel's failure to comply with this Court's CM-ECF Policies and Procedures Manual, Section II(A)(4)(a). Counsel to refile and provide description of each exhibit within the docket text. (nv) |
| Filing 7 STRICKEN RESPONSE to Farmers' Notice of Removal and Plaintiffs' Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Tabor, Geoffrey) |
| IMPORTANT NOTICE: The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (OKWD) is upgrading its current CM/ECF system to the Next Generation of CM/ECF (NextGen CM/ECF) on Monday, August 3, 2020. Complete information regarding the OKWD NextGen CM/ECF implementation is available at #http://www.okwd.uscourts.gov/nextgen-information.****Currently, you may share a single PACER account with other attorneys in your firm. With the new OKWD NextGen CM/ECF system, sharing of individual PACER accounts is prohibited. You must have an individual upgraded PACER account linked to your e-filing account. Once again, shared PACER accounts cannot be used by OKWD e-filing attorneys. ****Preparing for NextGen CM/ECF is a two-step process. Step one is to upgrade your PACER account and step two is to link your upgraded PACER account to the OKWD e-filing account in the upgraded NextGen CM/ECF system. This notice only addresses the first step because the second step cannot be completed until on or after August 3, 2020. ****Many PACER accounts have already been upgraded. The first step is to determine whether you have an "Upgraded" PACER account. If any of the following is true, you have an upgraded PACER account and no action is required until after the OKWD NextGen CM/ECF upgrade on August 3, 2020: 1) You have an upgraded PACER account for another NextGen court or 2) Your PACER account was created after August 10, 2014. If neither of these is true, you must upgrade your legacy PACER account before you can link your PACER account to your new NextGen CM/ECF account. ****OKWDs current CM/ECF system will NOT be available from 11:00 AM on 07/31/20 until 8:00 AM on 08/03/20 due to the upgrade. ****Additional notices will be sent at a later date regarding the second step of this process. If you have questions, please contact the PACER Service Center at 800-676-6856 or the OKWD Clerk's Office CM/ECF Help Desk at 405-609-5555. (Pigott, William) (ADI) |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Farmers Insurance Company Inc. (Taylor, Robert) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Farmers Insurance Company Inc.(Taylor, Robert) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Michelle Harris on behalf of Farmers Insurance Company Inc (Harris, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Farmers Insurance Company Inc . (Taylor, Robert) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert H Taylor on behalf of Farmers Insurance Company Inc (Taylor, Robert) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-3180953. (Taylor, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Payne County, case number CJ-2020-172 filed by Farmers Insurance Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Petition, #2 Exhibit 2 - OSCN Case Details, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(em) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
