Cole v. Crow et al
5:2020cv00655 |
September 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 ORDER ADOPTING 64 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION in its entirety. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 62 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 60 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Charles Goodwin on 02/10/2022. (jb) |
Filing 55 ORDER ADOPTING 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DENYING AS MOOT 43 Motion to Dismiss filed by Donna McCaslin, Scott Crow, Lonnie Lawson, Tonia Dickerson; and DENYING 35 Motion to Certify Class filed by Steven Lind Cole. The Court ACCEPT S Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal (Doc. No. 51 ). Plaintiff's Claim Two, as well as any claim for relief within Plaintiff's Claim Three premised upon the existence of a state-created liberty interest in the earning of sentence cr edits, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This matter is re-referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for further proceedings as to Plaintiffs remaining claims in accordance with the previous order of referral. Signed by Honorable Charles Goodwin on 09/15/2021. (jb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cole v. Crow et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.