O'Reilly v. Medtronic Inc et al
| Sandra O'Reilly |
| ABC Corp, F&A Foundation LLC doing business as Reign Medical, John Doe, Medtronic Inc and Reign Medical |
| 5:2020cv00840 |
| August 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Bernard Jones |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER ~ The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint #10 . In light of the anticipated Second Amended Complaint, the Court STRIKES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #9 as MOOT. Within 14 days of the filing of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, Defendant may file a responsive pleading. Additionally, as Plaintiff's counsel, Thomas J. Steece, has not yet filed an Entry of Appearance in compliance with LCvR83.4, he shall do so on or before October 23, 2020. Signed by Honorable Bernard M. Jones on 10/16/2020. (dwl)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER ~ Granting #12 and #13 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Sara K. Thompson and Brandon D. Cox are hereby admitted to practice before this Court for the limited purpose of participating in this case, provided each counsel submits an ECF registration form and files an entry of appearance. Signed by Honorable Bernard M. Jones on 10/14/2020. (dwl)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Brandon D. Cox Filing fee $ 50, receipt number AOKWDC-3329872 by Medtronic Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Request for Admission)(Wilson, Ryan) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sara K. Thompson Filing fee $ 50, receipt number AOKWDC-3329466 by Medtronic Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Request for Admission)(Wilson, Ryan) |
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Medtronic Inc. (Wilson, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss and Cross-Motion for Leave of Court to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Sandra O'Reilly. (Steece, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Medtronic Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Wilson, Ryan) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER ~ re #5 Motion to Dismiss. The Court STRIKES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as MOOT. Signed by Honorable Bernard M. Jones on 9/14/2020. (dwl)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Medtronic Inc filed by Sandra O'Reilly.(Steece, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss (this relates to the Notice of Removal) filed by Sandra O'Reilly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Implant Data Sheet, #2 Exhibit 2- Dismissals)(Steece, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Medtronic Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Wilson, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Ryan S Wilson on behalf of Medtronic Inc (Wilson, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Medtronic Inc . (Wilson, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Medtronic Inc. (Wilson, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Oklahoma County District Court, case number CJ-2020-3557 filed by Medtronic Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Jason Ruege (signed with exhibits), #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Docket Sheet as of 8.20.20, #3 Exhibit 3 - District Court Petition, #4 Exhibit 4. District Court Summons, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(knt) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AOKWDC-3238746. (Wilson, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
