Brewington v. Oklahoma State of
Petitioner: Charles Carson Brewington
Respondent: Oklahoma State of
Case Number: 5:2020cv01154
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Shon T Erwin
Referring Judge: David L Russell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2021 Filing 13 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Amended) filed by Charles Carson Brewington. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt)
December 28, 2020 Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT by Charles Carson Brewington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Order Affirming Denial of Application, #2 Exhibit 2 - Marked Copy of Judgment, #3 Envelope)(kmt)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER -- Having reviewed the Petition, the undersigned finds that Petitioner has failed to use the proper form, and therefore his Petition fails to provide the Court with the relevant information. Petitioner shall resubmit his petition for writ of habeas corpus no later than January 5, 2021. See order as more fully set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 12/17/2020. (mc)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles Carson Brewington, #7 Report and Recommendation, the motion for leave is DENIED and the matter is re-referred toJudge Erwin for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 12/9/20. (jw)
December 8, 2020 Filing 9 Receipt for Money Received from Charles Carson Brewington in the amount of $5.00, receipt number OKW500083137 regarding #1 Petition, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Mailed to Charles Carson Brewington #202452 JHCC-LEXINGTON Joseph Harp Correctional Center P O Box 548 Lexington, OK 73051 (kah)
December 2, 2020 Filing 8 OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #7 filed by Charles Carson Brewington. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- It is further recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice to re-filing unless Petitioner pays the $5.00 filing fee in full to the Clerk of the Court within twenty (20) days of any order adopting this Report and Recommendation. This report and recommendation terminates the referral to the undersigned Magistrate Judge unless and until the matter is re-referred. Objections to R&R due by 12/7/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 11/19/2020. (mc)
November 19, 2020 Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc)
November 18, 2020 Filing 6 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin.. Signed at the direction of The Honorable David L. Russell on 11/18/2020. (dtb)
November 18, 2020 Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable David L. Russell for all further proceedings. Honorable Stephen P. Friot no longer assigned to case. Signed at the direction of The Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 11/18/2020. (dtb)
November 16, 2020 Filing 4 PREVIOUS Cases (dtb)
November 16, 2020 Filing 3 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Charles Carson Brewington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Excerpt from News Article Titled Supreme Court Takes New Look at Indian Reservations, #2 Exhibit 2 - Petition Filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals, #3 Exhibit 3 - Excerpt from Paper Titled Real Estate Ownership in Oklahoma, #4 Exhibit 4 - Excerpt from Order Filed in Western District of Arkansas, #5 Exhibit 5 - Excerpt from Order filed in Western District of Arkansas, #6 Exhibit 6 - General Guide to Criminal Jurisdiction in Indian Country, #7 Exhibit 7 - General Guide to Criminal Jurisdiction in Indian Country Continued, #8 Exhibit 8 - Copy of Article Tited A Response to Lee Correctional Facility Tragedy, #9 Exhibit 9 - Copy of Article Titled J20 Case Ends in Dropped Charges After Prosecutor Caught Hiding Evidence, #10 Exhibit 10 - Tribal Jurisdiction in Oklahoma Map, #11 Exhibit 11 - Tribal Jurisdictions in Oklahoma Map, #12 Exhibit 12 - Excerpt from Court Opinion, #13 Exhibit 13 - Excerpt from Document Titled Consequences for a Judge Not Following the Law, #14 Exhibit 14 - Report from Gonderson and Assoc. Professional Investigations, #15 Exhibit 15 - Certificate of Service, #16 Envelope)(dtb)
November 16, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Carson Brewington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Transaction List, #2 Exhibit 2 - Account Balance, #3 Exhibit 3 - Numbers for Paupers Affidavit, #4 Envelope)(dtb)
November 16, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Carson Brewington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Documentation with Notes, #2 Envelope)(dtb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brewington v. Oklahoma State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Carson Brewington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Oklahoma State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?