Mitchell v. Dowling
| Richard Todd Mitchell |
| Janet Dowling |
| 5:2020cv01202 |
| November 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Jodi W Dishman |
| Amanda Maxfield Green |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE (other) by Richard Todd Mitchell (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt) |
Filing 8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Upon its review of the Motion and exhibit Doc. No. #2 and the Report and Recommendation, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation Doc. No. #7 in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Mr. Mitchells Motion for Leaveto Proceed in forma pauperis Doc. No. #2 is DENIED. Mr. Mitchell is ORDERED topay the full $5 filing fee to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of this Order, or by January 21, 2021, or this action will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 12/31/2020. (em)
|
| Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green no longer assigned to case. (rb) |
|
Filing 7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Richard Todd Mitchell. Because Petitioner has not shown he is entitled to authorization by this court to proceed without prepayment of the $5 filing fee, see 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), the undersigned recommends that the court deny Petitioner's application. The undersigned further recommends dismissal without prejudice to refiling of this action unless Petitioner pays the $5 filing fee in full to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of any order adopting this Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 12/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 12/2/2020. (rb)
|
| Filing 6 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green. Motions referred to Amanda Maxfield Green.Entered at the direction of the Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 12/1/2020. (em) |
| Filing 5 NO PREVIOUS Cases (em) |
| Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, Doc #1 , and Doc #6 to Richard Todd Mitchell #114726 HOMINY-DCCC 129 Conner Road Hominy, OK 74035 (em) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend by Richard Todd Mitchell. (em) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Order titled "Motion for Stay and Abeyance" by Richard Todd Mitchell. (em) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Todd Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Transaction List and Summary Balance for Richard Mitchell)(em) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Richard Todd Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(em) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitchell v. Dowling | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Janet Dowling | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Richard Todd Mitchell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
