Protective Life Insurance Company v. Overton et al
| Protective Life Insurance Company |
| Stacy Denette Overton, Stacy Denette Miller and Gwen Overton |
| 5:2020cv01212 |
| December 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Jodi W Dishman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Protective Life Insurance Company (Fischer, Amy) |
| Filing 12 ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING ORDER. On counsel's representation that the parties have reached a settlement and compromise of all claims in this case, it is ORDERED that the Clerk administratively terminate this action in her records. Unless a party moves to reopen or extend this proceeding within 30 days of the entry of this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice, and this Order shall become a final judgment that satisfies the separate-document requirement for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). Signed by Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 01/19/2021. (nv) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court extends the deadline for Defendant Gwen Overton to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint until February 10, 2021. Signed by Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 01/11/2021. (nv)
|
| Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint (Interpleader) by Gwen Overton. (Henry, Andrew) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The Court extends the deadline for Defendant Stacy Denette Overton to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint until January 22, 2021. Signed by Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 12/22/2020. (nv)
|
| Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to file an Answer by Stacy Denette Overton. (Edwards, Eric) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Eric N Edwards on behalf of Stacy Denette Overton (Edwards, Eric) |
| Filing 6 ENTER ORDER re #5 Entry of Appearance filed by Stacy Denette Overton is STRICKEN on the grounds that it improperly seeks an extension of Defendant Stacy Denette Overton's deadline to file an answer. Counsel must file a motion seeking such relief pursuant to LCvR7.1(h) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b) and 7(b) and should indicate whether the request is opposed or unopposed. Counsel is ordered to file an entry of appearance on the form for "Attorney Appearance" provided under the "Forms" tab on the website for the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, available at http://www.okwd.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/ao458_attorney_a.pdf. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 12/16/2020. (nv) |
| Filing 5 STRICKEN ENTRY of Appearance by Eric N Edwards on behalf of Stacy Denette Overton (Edwards, Eric) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Gwen Overton. (em) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Protective Life Insurance Company . (Fischer, Amy) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Amy Sherry Fischer on behalf of Protective Life Insurance Company (Fischer, Amy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Interpleader) against Gwen Overton, Stacy Denette Overton filed by Protective Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3421604. (Fischer, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
