Rohde v. University of Central Oklahoma Board of Regents
Nicklaus Rohde |
University of Central Oklahoma Board of Regents, University of Central Oklahoma, Amy Johnson and Amanda Horton |
5:2020cv01243 |
December 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Charles Goodwin |
Civil Rights: Education |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER denying as moot #6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Charles Goodwin on 01/26/2021. (jb) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT (First) against University of Central Oklahoma Board of Regents filed by Nicklaus Rohde.(Sonne, Blake) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by University of Central Oklahoma Board of Regents. (McClure, Kevin) |
Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Kevin L McClure on behalf of University of Central Oklahoma Board of Regents (McClure, Kevin) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Lauren J Ray on behalf of University of Central Oklahoma Board of Regents (Ray, Lauren) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Blake Sonne on behalf of Nicklaus Rohde (Sonne, Blake) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to University of Central Oklahoma Board of Regents. (kah) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3448571. (Sonne, Blake) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against University of Central Oklahoma Board of Regents filed by Nicklaus Rohde. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.