Ni v. Mayorkas et al
| Fang Ni |
| Monty Wilkinson and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 5:2021cv00169 |
| March 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Timothy D DeGiusti |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to Alejandro Mayorkas, Monty Wilkinson. (kmt) |
| Filing 6 PRO SE LITIGANT'S REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF 3 SUMMONS(ES) by Fang Ni. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Summons, #2 Envelope)(kmt) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 3/8/2021. (rb)
|
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Fang Ni Motions referred to Amanda Maxfield Green. Signed by the direction of Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 3/3/2021. (kmt) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LITIGANT'S REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF 3 SUMMONS(ES) by Fang Ni. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Summons)(kmt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fang Ni. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alejandro Mayorkas, Monty Wilkinson filed by Fang Ni. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Immigration Notice of Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
