Woods v. Nunn
| David Dean Woods |
| Scott Nunn |
| 5:2021cv00237 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Charles Goodwin |
| Gary M Purcell |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1153 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended this action Doc #1 re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed based on Petitioner's failure to state a claim for habeas relief. Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2021. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter, and any pending motion not specifically addressed herein is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 4/28/2021. (cps) |
| Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell no longer assigned to case. (cps) |
Filing 7
ORDER ADOPTING #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. #5 ) is ADOPTED, and Petitioner's application (Doc. No. #2 ) is DENIED. This matter is re-referred to Judge Purcell for further proceedings consistent with the initial case referral. Signed by Honorable Charles Goodwin on 04/27/2021. (jb)
|
| Filing 6 Receipt for Money Received from David Dean Woods in the amount of $5.00, receipt number OKW500085012 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Mailed to David Dean Woods HELENA-JCCC 216 N. Murray St. 4E Helena, OK 73741-9606 (kah) |
| Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell no longer assigned to case. (cps) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended Doc #2 re MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the action be dismissed without prejudice unless the Petitioner pays the full filing fee to the Clerk of Court by April 22, 2021. Objections to R&R due by 4/22/2021. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter, and any motion pending should be deemed denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 4/2/2021. (cps) |
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Motions referred to Gary M. Purcell. Signed by the direction of Honorable Charles Goodwin on 3/22/2021. (kah) |
| Filing 3 NO PREVIOUS Cases (kah) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Dean Woods. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Financial Statements, #2 Envelope)(kah) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by David Dean Woods. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - County Court Order 9.14.2020, #2 Exhibit 2 - Court of Criminal Appeals Order 1.25.2021, #3 Envelope)(kah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woods v. Nunn | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Scott Nunn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Dean Woods | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
