Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD v. Malcolm et al
Plaintiff: Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD
Defendant: Larry Lee Malcolm and Nancy I Malcolm
Case Number: 5:2021cv00407
Filed: April 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Jodi W Dishman
Referring Judge: David L Russell
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER; The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Consolidate [Doc. 15], requesting the Court to consolidate CIV-21-406-R and CIV-21-407-R1. Upon review of the motion, and for good cause shown, the Court grants the motion. This Order shall be filed in both cases.. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 6/4/21. (jw)
June 4, 2021 Filing 16 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to the Honorable David L. Russell for all further proceedings. Honorable Jodi W. Dishman no longer assigned to case. Please note that for future filings in this case, the letter at the end of the number should now be an "R" rather than a(n) "JD". This is important to ensure the prompt distribution of pleadings to the proper judge. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 6/4/2021. (nv)
May 27, 2021 Filing 15 CIVIL STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET: Scheduling Conference set for 7/8/2021 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 502 before the Honorable Jodi W. Dishman. Status Report due by 6/30/2021. (knt)
May 24, 2021 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Larry Lee Malcolm, Nancy I Malcolm.(Dean, Ryan)
May 24, 2021 Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Ryan L Dean on behalf of All Defendants (Dean, Ryan)
May 24, 2021 Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert C Nelson on behalf of All Defendants (Nelson, Robert)
May 24, 2021 Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - LLC by Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD Second Amended. (Jones, Myrenda)
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. Because the filings in this case do not confirm the existence of diversity jurisdiction, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause within fourteen (14) days why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a supplemental brief establishing diversity of jurisdiction within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order that addresses the issues described in this Order with citations to authority as appropriate, or Plaintiff may file an amended complaint as and if permitted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. See Order for all details. Signed by Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 05/17/2021. (knt)
May 10, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD. (Jones, Myrenda)
May 10, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD. Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD served on 5/3/2021. (Jones, Myrenda)
May 4, 2021 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - LLC by Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD Amended. (Jones, Myrenda)
May 4, 2021 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - LLC by Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD . (Jones, Myrenda)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. By May 10, 2021, Gaedeke shall file (1) a corporate disclosure statement that is compliant with Rule 7.1 and LCvR7.1.1, and (2) if the corporate disclosure statement does not identify each member of Gaedeke and that member's citizenship, Gaedeke shall file a response to this Order identifying this information to establish the existence of diversity jurisdiction. Failure to establish the existence of diversity jurisdiction may result in the Court's dismissal of the lawsuit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 05/03/2021. (nv)
April 28, 2021 Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Myrenda Ralene Jones on behalf of Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD (Jones, Myrenda)
April 28, 2021 Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Gregory L Mahaffey on behalf of Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD (Mahaffey, Gregory)
April 28, 2021 PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3672593. (Mahaffey, Gregory)
April 27, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Larry Lee Malcolm, Nancy I Malcolm. (knt)
April 27, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Larry Lee Malcolm, Nancy I Malcolm filed by Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Check, #2 Exhibit 2 - Demand Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(knt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD v. Malcolm et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Lee Malcolm
Represented By: Robert C Nelson
Represented By: Ryan L Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy I Malcolm
Represented By: Robert C Nelson
Represented By: Ryan L Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gaedeke Holdings VII LTD
Represented By: Myrenda Ralene Jones
Represented By: Gregory L Mahaffey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?