Woodfork v. Nunn et al
James J Woodfork and James Jermaine Woodfork |
Mike Rogers, Scott Crow, Scott Nunn, Securus and FNU Rackley |
5:2021cv00492 |
May 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Joe Heaton |
Suzanne Mitchell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by James Jermaine Woodfork, #3 MOTION to Expedite filed by James Jermaine Woodfork. The undersigned recommends the Court deny the motions. Objections to R&R due by 7/27/2021. This report and recommendation does not terminate the Court's referral to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 7/6/21. (lb) |
Filing 11 ORDER plaintiff's application #2 and the Report and Recommendation #8 of Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell are stricken as moot...this matter is re-referred to Judge Mitchell for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 06/14/2021. (lam) |
Filing 10 Receipt for Money Received from James Jermaine Woodfork in the amount of $402, receipt number OKW500085764 regarding #1 Complaint, Mailed receipt to James Jermaine Woodfork #243884 HELENA-JCCC 216 N. Murray St. 4E Helena, OK 73741-9606 (jjs) |
Filing 9 NOTICE Titled "Notice to the Court" by James J Woodfork re #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James J Woodfork (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Request for Disbursement, #2 Envelope)(jjs) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James J Woodfork. The undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's application be denied. Objections to R&R due by 6/8/2021. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues and terminates the referral to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 5/18/21. (lb) |
Filing 7 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell. Signed by the direction of Honorable Joe Heaton on 5/17/2021. (kmt) |
Filing 6 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable Joe Heaton for all further proceedings. Honorable David L. Russell no longer assigned to case. Signed by the direction of Honorable David L. Russell on 5/17/2021. (kmt) |
Filing 5 PREVIOUS Cases (kmt) |
Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, #1 Complaint, #6 Enter Order, #7 Enter Order to James J Woodfork #243884 HELENA-JCCC 216 N. Murray St. 4E Helena, OK 73741-9606 (kmt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction titled, "Petition for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order" by James J Woodfork. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Expedite titled, "Motion to Expedite Pursuant to 28 USC 1657" by James J Woodfork. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James J Woodfork. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scott Crow(In official capacity, Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections), Scott Crow(Individually), Scott Nunn(In official capacity, Warden), Scott Nunn(Individually), FNU Rackley(Individually), FNU Rackley(In official capacity, CO), Mike Rogers(Individually), Mike Rogers(In official capacity, Chief of Security), Securus filed by James J Woodfork. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Inmate Grievance, #2 Envelope)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.