Anthony v. City of Oklahoma City et al
Richard Anthony |
Signal 88 LLC, City of Oklahoma City, Caleb Gottschalk, Randy Rigsby and Anton Corporation LLC doing business as Signal 88 Security of Oklahoma City for Signal 88 LLC |
5:2021cv00533 |
May 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Stephen P Friot |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 REPLY to Response to Motion re #20 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) and Brief in Support filed by Caleb Gottschalk(individully), Caleb Gottschalk(in his official capacity as a police officer for Oklahoma City Police Department ). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Lippe v. Howard)(Felkner, Stacey) |
Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #20 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) and Brief in Support filed by All Plaintiffs. (Neal, Laura) |
Filing 24 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint by Anton Corporation LLC, Randy Rigsby, Signal 88 LLC.(Goolsby, Robert) |
Filing 23 NOTICE (other) by Anton Corporation LLC, Randy Rigsby, Signal 88 LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, (Goolsby, Robert) |
Filing 22 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert T Goolsby on behalf of Anton Corporation LLC, Randy Rigsby (Goolsby, Robert) |
Filing 21 (STRICKEN by 6/22/2021 Notice from the Court) NOTICE (other) by Caleb Gottschalk(individully), Caleb Gottschalk(in his official capacity as a police officer for Oklahoma City Police Department ) Initial Disclosures (Felkner, Stacey) Modified on 6/22/2021 (llg). |
NOTICE from the Court STRIKING #21 Initial Disclosures of Defendant Caleb Gottschalk, as initial disclosures are not to be filed. See, Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(d)(1) "... disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) or (2)... must not be filed until they are used in the proceeding or the court orders filing...." (llg) |
Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) and Brief in Support by Caleb Gottschalk(individully), Caleb Gottschalk(in his official capacity as a police officer for Oklahoma City Police Department ). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Salazar v. City of OKC, #2 Exhibit 2 - Koch v. City of Del City, #3 Exhibit 3 - Citation 175324312-01, #4 Exhibit 4 - Citation 175324321-01, #5 Exhibit 5 - Washington v. Rogers, #6 Exhibit 6 - Duvall v. OSBOE, #7 Exhibit 7 - Bills v. OKC)(Felkner, Stacey) |
Filing 19 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint by Caleb Gottschalk(individully), Caleb Gottschalk(in his official capacity as a police officer for Oklahoma City Police Department ).(Felkner, Stacey) |
Filing 18 NOTICE (other) by Caleb Gottschalk(in his official capacity as a police officer for Oklahoma City Police Department ) re #1 Notice of Removal, Amended Notice of Consent to Removal (Gooch, Ambre) |
Filing 17 ENTRY of Appearance by Stacey Haws Felkner on behalf of Caleb Gottschalk(in his official capacity as a police officer for Oklahoma City Police Department ) (Felkner, Stacey) |
Filing 16 ENTRY of Appearance by Ambre C Gooch on behalf of Caleb Gottschalk(in his official capacity as a police officer for Oklahoma City Police Department ) (Gooch, Ambre) |
Filing 15 NOTICE (other) by Caleb Gottschalk(individully) re #1 Notice of Removal, of Consent to Removal (Gooch, Ambre) |
Filing 14 ENTRY of Appearance by Ambre C Gooch on behalf of Caleb Gottschalk(individully) (Gooch, Ambre) |
Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Stacey Haws Felkner on behalf of Caleb Gottschalk(individully) (Felkner, Stacey) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint by City of Oklahoma City.(Goff, Mary) |
Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Joseph S Carson on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Carson, Joseph) |
Filing 10 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by All Plaintiffs. (Neal, Laura) |
Filing 9 ORDER striking as moot #4 Defendant City of Oklahoma City's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 6/7/2021. (llg) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by All Plaintiffs.(Neal, Laura) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint to Correct a Party Name and the Claim for Punitive Damages. Amended Complaint to be filed within 10 days of entry of this order. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 6/4/2021. (llg) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave To Amend Complaint To Correct a Party Name and the Claim for Punitive Damages by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Amended Complaint)(Neal, Laura) |
Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Laura S Neal on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Neal, Laura) |
NOTICE from the Court re #6 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave To Amend Complaint To Correct a Party Name and the Claim for Punitive Damages. Counsel for plaintiff is DIRECTED, in future filings, to comply with the court's ECF Policies & Procedures Manual, Section II.A.4.a. - "Exhibits... shall be clearly labeled with the appropriate exhibit number.... Do not use alphabetical or alpha-numeric designations for exhibits...." Failure to comply in the future may result in filings being stricken. (llg) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by City of Oklahoma City. (Goff, Mary) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Sherri R Katz on behalf of City of Oklahoma City (Katz, Sherri) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Mary K Goff on behalf of City of Oklahoma City (Goff, Mary) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3689119. (Goff, Mary) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from The District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-2021-1582 filed by City of Oklahoma City. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Petition, #2 Exhibit 2-Summons, #3 Exhibit 3- Return of Service, #4 Exhibit 4- Docket Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.