Sanchez v. Carranza
Mireya Sanchez |
Gibran Carranza |
5:2021cv00600 |
June 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Bernard M Jones |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER ~ The Court ordered a hearing on the temporary restraining order #4 , which was held on June 17, 2021. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Petition for Return of Child, as well as her Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. [Doc. Nos. 1, 3]. Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Bernard M. Jones on 6/17/2021. (dwl) |
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Audrey T Cocon on behalf of Gibran Carranza (Cocon, Audrey) |
Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Gibran Carranza. (Edstrom, Michelle) |
Filing 4 ORDER ~ Upon review of Plaintiff's Verified Complaint and Petition for Return of Child #1 seeking a temporary restraining order, the Court has determined that a hearing is necessary, which is hereby set for 1:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 17, 2021, in Courtroom 303 before Honorable Bernard M. Jones. Signed by Honorable Bernard M. Jones on 6/11/2021. (dwl) |
Filing 3 EX PARTE MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Under the Hague Convention and Scheduling of Expedited Hearing by Mireya Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion, #2 Affidavit Rule 65 Affidavit)(Edstrom, Michelle) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Gibran Carranza. (knt) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3701510. (Edstrom, Michelle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Petition for Return of Child against Gibran Carranza filed by Mireya Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Hague Convention, #2 Exhibit 2 - Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act Affidavit, #3 Exhibit 3 - Petitioner and Respondent's Marriage Certificate, #4 Exhibit 4 - Child's Birth Certificate and Mexican Registration, #5 Exhibit 5 - Documentation of Child's Attendance in Mexican School, #6 Exhibit 6 - Petitioner and Respondent's Divorce Decree, #7 Exhibit 7 - Documentation of Child's Medical Care in Mexico, #8 Exhibit 8 - Pictures of Child in Mexico, #9 Exhibit 9 - Affidavit from Petitioner's Sister, #10 Exhibit 10 - Child's Passport Application, #11 Exhibit 11 - WhatsApp Conversation, #12 Exhibit 12 - Mexican Police Report, #13 Exhibit 13 - Google Maps Printout, #14 Exhibit 14 - U.S. Department of State Letter, #15 Exhibit 15 - Mexican Civil Code, #16 Exhibit 16 - Penal Code, #17 Appendix 1 - Appendix of Exhibits, #18 Civil Cover Sheet)(knt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sanchez v. Carranza | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mireya Sanchez | |
Represented By: | Michelle L Edstrom |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Gibran Carranza | |
Represented By: | Audrey T Cocon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.