Porras v. North Oklahoma County Mental Health
| Dr. Xiomara J Porras |
| North Oklahoma County Mental Health doing business as Northcare |
| 5:2021cv00631 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Stephen P Friot |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: Jury Trial set for 7/11/2023 09:30 AM in Courtroom 401 before Judge Stephen P. Friot. (llg)
|
|
Filing 34
ORDER DENYING #33 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Deadlines or Hearings by Three (3) Months filed by Xiomara J Porras and GRANTING a continuance of this case to the courts July 2023 trial docket. Pla expert witness list and expert reports due 02/21/2023; Dft expert witness list and expert reports due 03/07/2023; Dft exhibit list due 03/07/2023; Motions in limine due 06/16/2023; Jury instructions due 06/16/2023; Voir dire requests due 06/16/2023; Trial briefs due 06/16/2023; Motions due by 4/3/2023., Pretrial Report due by 6/16/2023.). Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 11/1/2022. (dtb)
|
|
Filing 33
UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Deadlines or Hearings by Three (3) Months by All Plaintiffs. (Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 32
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER granting #31 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Deadlines or Hearings by Three (3) Months filed by Xiomara J Porras: Pla witness list due 11/10/2022; Dft witness list due 11/24/2022; Pla exhibit list due 11/10/2022; Dft exhibit list due 11/24/2022; Dispositive & Daubert Motions due 12/1/2022; Discovery due 2/15/2023; Motions in limine due 2/21/2023; Jury instructions & verdict forms due 2/21/2023; Voir dire requests due 2/21/2023; Trial briefs due 2/21/2023; Pretrial Report due 2/21/2023; Jury Trial set for 3/14/2023 09:30 AM in Courtroom 401 before Judge Stephen P. Friot. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 8/22/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 31
UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Deadlines or Hearings by Three (3) Months by All Plaintiffs. (Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 30
Witness List by Plaintiff Xiomara J Porras. (Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 29
Exhibit List by Plaintiff Xiomara J Porras. (Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 28
Expert Witness List by Plaintiff Xiomara J Porras. (Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER granting #26 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record. Attorney Brandon D Roberts withdrawn as counsel for plf. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 6/1/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 26
MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by All Plaintiffs. (Roberts, Brandon)
|
|
Filing 25
NOTICE (other) by North Oklahoma County Mental Health re #24 Notice of Subpoena, of Partial Withdrawal (Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 24
NOTICE of Subpoena by North Oklahoma County Mental Health (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to Carlos A. Egas, M.D., #2 Exhibit 2 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to Integris Health, Inc., #3 Exhibit 3 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to Joykumar G. Patel, M.D., #4 Exhibit 4 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to SSM Health Care of Oklahoma, Inc.)(Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE of Subpoena by North Oklahoma County Mental Health (Amended) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to the Oklahoma Mental Health Council, #2 Exhibit 2 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to Oakwood Springs, #3 Exhibit 3 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to Hope Community Services, #4 Exhibit 4 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to SSM Health Care of Oklahoma, #5 Exhibit 5 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to Porras Family Care)(Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 22
NOTICE of Subpoena by North Oklahoma County Mental Health (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to the Oklahoma Mental Health Council, #2 Exhibit 2 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to Oakwood Springs, #3 Exhibit 3 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to Hope Community Services, #4 Exhibit 4 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to SSM Health Care of Oklahoma, #5 Exhibit 5 - Subpoena Duces Tecum to Porras Family Care)(Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 21
SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to join due 3/1/2022; Motions to amend due 3/1/2022; Pla expert witness list and expert reports due 7/20/2022; Dft expert witness list and expert reports due 21 days t/a; Pla witness list due 8/10/2022; Dft witness list due 14 days t/a; Pla exhibit list due 8/10/2022; Dft exhibit list due 14 days t/a; Motions in limine due 11/15/2022; Jury instructions & verdict forms due 11/15/2022; Voir dire requests due 11/15/2022; Trial briefs due 11/15/2022; Discovery due by 11/15/2022. Jury Trial set for 12/6/2022 09:30 AM in Courtroom 401 before Judge Stephen P. Friot. Dispositive & Daubert Motions due by 9/1/2022. Pretrial Report due by 11/15/2022. Entered at the direction of Judge Stephen P. Friot on 12/1/2021. (llg)
|
|
Filing 20
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 11/29/2021. (llg)
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION for Protective Order Agreed by All Plaintiffs. (Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 18
JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN by Plaintiff Xiomara J Porras. (Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 17
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by North Oklahoma County Mental Health . (Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 16
TELEPHONIC STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 12/1/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Stephen P. Friot. Status Report due by 11/24/2021. (llg)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER denying #6 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part #9 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Northcare's defenses numbered 15, 16, 17 and 18. These defenses are STRICKEN from Northcare's answer and will remain stricken absent a successful amendment. If Northcare wishes to file an amended answer to support these defenses, it may do so for that limited purpose only, subject to the strictures of Rule 11, which apply as fully to an answer as to a complaint. Any such amended answer is DUE seven days from the date of this order. The motion is also GRANTED with respect to defense no. 24, which is STRICKEN without leave to amend. The motion is DENIED with respect to Northcare's defenses numbered 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20 and 21. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 11/1/2021. (llg)
|
|
Filing 14
REPLY by Plaintiff Xiomara J Porras re #9 MOTION to Strike #5 Answer to Complaint / Disclaimer Affirmative Defenses, #11 Response to Motion,, in Support of Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Email, #2 Exhibit 2- Bell Answer, #3 Exhibit 3- Topline Solutions v. Sandler, #4 Exhibit 4- United Built Homes v. Middleton, #5 Exhibit 5- Swan Global v. Young, #6 Exhibit 6- Washington v. Integris, #7 Exhibit 7- Gibson v. Officemax, #8 Exhibit 8- Bell v. America's Powersports)(Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply re #9 MOTION to Strike #5 Affirmative Defenses. Reply due by 8/19/2021. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 8/12/2021. (llg)
|
|
Filing 12
UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Deadlines or Hearings to Enlarge Plaintiff's Deadline to File a Reply in Support of her Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses by All Plaintiffs. (Hurst, Amber) Modified on 8/12/2021 (llg).
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Strike #5 Answer to Complaint / Disclaimer Affirmative Defenses and Brief in Support filed by North Oklahoma County Mental Health. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Answer of Defendant, Appeal No. 16-2067, Stapp v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs., #2 Exhibit 2 - Plaintiff's Surreply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Case No. CIV-16-79-L, Richter v. Independent School Dist. No. 89 of Okla. Cty.)(Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 10
REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) and Brief in Support filed by North Oklahoma County Mental Health. (Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Strike #5 Answer to Complaint / Disclaimer Affirmative Defenses by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Williams v. Encore Healthcare, #2 Exhibit 2- Jackson v Fronk Oil - West (WDOK), #3 Exhibit 3- Kohler v. Big 5 Corp, #4 Exhibit 4- Boardwalk Apts v. State Auto Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.)(Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) and Brief in Support filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Asebedo v. Kan. State Univ, #2 Exhibit 2- Dickman v. Lahood, #3 Exhibit 3- Bishop v. Oklahoma ex rel. Dept of Human Services, #4 Exhibit 4- Corson v. Modula, Inc., #5 Exhibit 5- Fattaey v. Kan. State Univ.)(Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 7
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by All Plaintiffs. (Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) and Brief in Support by North Oklahoma County Mental Health. (Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand (Partial) by North Oklahoma County Mental Health.(Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 4
ENTRY of Appearance by Jeffrey C Hendrickson on behalf of North Oklahoma County Mental Health (Hendrickson, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 3
ENTRY of Appearance by Jessica L Dark on behalf of North Oklahoma County Mental Health (Dark, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 2
Receipt for Money Received from North Oklahoma County Mental Health in the amount of $402, receipt number OKW500085982 regarding #1 Notice of Removal, (dtb)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from The District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-2021-2302 filed by North Oklahoma County Mental Health. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit 2- Petition, #3 Exhibit 3- Entries of Appearance, #4 Exhibit 4- Return of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
