Donehue et al v. Apache Corporation
Kindall Leigh Donehue and Andrew Joseph Donehue |
Apache Corporation |
5:2021cv00710 |
July 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Timothy D DeGiusti |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Mark Banner on behalf of Apache Corporation (Banner, Mark) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Apache Corporation.(Williams, D) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by D Kenyon Williams on behalf of Apache Corporation (Williams, D) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kindall Leigh Donehue, Andrew Joseph Donehue. Apache Corporation served on 7/19/2021. (Neller, Corey) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Apache Corporation. (kmt) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Patrick R Pearce, Jr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Pearce, Patrick) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Corey A Neller on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Neller, Corey) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Phillip G Whaley on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Whaley, Phillip) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3722140. (Whaley, Phillip) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apache Corporation filed by Kindall Leigh Donehue, Andrew Joseph Donehue. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.