Williams v. Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs
| Tammy Williams |
| Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs doing business as Oklahoma State of |
| 5:2021cv00735 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Timothy D DeGiusti |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) and Brief in Support by Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs. (Ray, Lauren) |
Filing 11
ORDER denying #9 Amended Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 8/30/2021. (mb)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs filed by Tammy Williams.(Roper, Leah) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss by Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs. (Ray, Lauren) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Defendants Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Motion toDismiss. Defendant is authorized to file its Amended Motion to Dismiss within 7 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 8/6/2021. (mb)
|
| Filing 7 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File Amended Motion to Dismiss by Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs. (Moore, Erin) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Eagle Air Med Corp v Martin (unpublished), #2 Attachment McClelland v. CommunityCare HMO Inc. (unpublished case))(Ray, Lauren) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Tammy Williams. (Roper, Leah) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Leah M Roper on behalf of Tammy Williams (Roper, Leah) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Erin M Moore on behalf of Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs (Moore, Erin) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Lauren J Ray on behalf of Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs (Ray, Lauren) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-21-2936 filed by Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - OSCN Case Details, #2 Exhibit 2 - 2021-07-09 - Petition, #3 Exhibit 3 - 2021-07-09 - EOA - Jessica Brown for Pl, #4 Exhibit 4 - 2021-07-09 - EOA Leah Roper for Pl, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3727297. (Ray, Lauren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tammy Williams | |
| Represented By: | Jessica L Brown |
| Represented By: | Leah M Roper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs doing business as Oklahoma State of | |
| Represented By: | Erin M Moore |
| Represented By: | Lauren J Ray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
