Pratt v. Walmart Inc
Ryan Preston Pratt |
Walmart Inc |
5:2021cv01010 |
October 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Timothy D DeGiusti |
Stephen P Friot |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to join due 1/3/2022; Motions to amend due 1/3/2022; Pla expert witness list and expert reports due 7/20/2022; Dft expert witness list and expert reports due 21 days t/a; Pla witness list due 8/10/2022; Dft witness list due 14 days t/a; Pla exhibit list due 8/10/2022; Dft exhibit list due 14 days t/a; Motions in limine due 11/15/2022; Jury instructions & verdict forms due 11/15/2022; Voir dire requests due 11/15/2022; Trial briefs due 11/15/2022; Discovery due by 11/15/2022. Jury Trial set for 12/6/2022 09:30 AM in Courtroom 401 before Judge Stephen P. Friot. Dispositive & Daubert Motions due by 3/1/2022. Pretrial Report due by 11/15/2022. Entered at the direction of Judge Stephen P. Friot on 12/1/2021. (llg) |
Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN by Plaintiff Ryan Preston Pratt. (Shadid, Danny) |
Filing 11 TELEPHONIC STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 12/1/2021 09:45 AM before Judge Stephen P. Friot. Status Report due by 11/24/2021. (llg) |
Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Walmart Inc . (Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Walmart Inc. (Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael W Brewer on behalf of Walmart Inc (Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Walmart Inc.(Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 6 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Stephen P. Friot for all further proceedings. Judge Bernard M. Jones no longer assigned to case. Entered by direction of Judge Bernard M. Jones on 11/02/2021. (knt) |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Bernard M. Jones for all further proceedings. Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 10/25/2021. (mb) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL... Signed by Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 10/25/2021. (mb) |
Filing 3 Receipt for Money Received from Ryan Preston Pratt in the amount of $402.00, receipt number OKW500087649 regarding #1 Complaint. Receipt provided to plaintiff at Court Clerk's Office. (kah) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Walmart Inc. (kmt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Walmart Inc filed by Ryan Preston Pratt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pratt v. Walmart Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ryan Preston Pratt | |
Represented By: | Danny K Shadid |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Walmart Inc | |
Represented By: | Michael W Brewer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.