Doak v. Nunn
Larry Doak |
Scott Nunn |
5:2021cv01032 |
October 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Timothy D DeGiusti |
Suzanne Mitchell |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Untimely filed by Larry Doak. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Brief, #2 Exhibit 2 - Ground, #3 Exhibit 3 - Motion to Dismiss, #4 Envelope)(kmt) |
Filing 9 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Untimely by Scott Nunn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-J&S CF-1998-80, #2 Exhibit 2- J&S CF-1998-81, #3 Exhibit 3-J&S for CF-1998-83, #4 Exhibit 4-Summary Opinion in F-1998-802, #5 Exhibit 5-Motion for Transcripts at Public Expense, #6 Exhibit 6-Order Denying Motion for Transcripts, #7 Exhibit 7-Docket sheet for CF-1998-80, #8 Exhibit 8-Docket sheet for CF-1998-81, #9 Exhibit 9-Docket Sheet for CF-1998-83, #10 Exhibit 10-Petitioners First Application for Post-Conviction Relief, #11 Exhibit 11-Petitioners Brief-in-Support of Application, #12 Exhibit 12-Order Denying Post-Conviction Relief, #13 Exhibit 13-Order Declining Jurisdiction in PC-2001-214, #14 Exhibit 14-Motion for Sentence Modification, #15 Exhibit 15-PCR Application for CF-1998-80, #16 Exhibit 16-PCR Application for CF-1998-81, #17 Exhibit 17-PCR Application for CF-1998-83-18, #18 Exhibit 18-Order Affirming Denial of Post-Conviction Relief)(Hunt, Caroline) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Untimely by Scott Nunn. Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. (Hunt, Caroline) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Caroline EJ Hunt on behalf of Scott Nunn (Hunt, Caroline) |
![]() |
Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell. Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. Signed by the direction of Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 10/25/2021. (kmt) |
Filing 4 NO PREVIOUS Cases (kmt) |
Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, #1 Petition, #3 Enter Order to Larry DoakHELENA-JCCC216 N. Murray St.Helena, OK 73741-9606 (kmt) |
Filing 3 Receipt for Money Received from Larry Doak in the amount of $5.00, receipt number OKW500087708 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (kmt) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Larry Doak. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Transaction List, #2 Exhibit 2 - Account Balance, #3 Envelope)(kmt) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Larry Doak. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Doak v. Nunn | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Larry Doak | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Scott Nunn | |
Represented By: | Caroline EJ Hunt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.