State of Oklahoma v. United States of America et al
| State of Oklahoma |
| United States of America |
| Mitchco International, Inc. |
| 5:2021cv01072 |
| November 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Stephen P Friot |
| Scott L Palk |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 20 U.S.C. § 107 OPERATION OF VENDING FACILITIES |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 NOTICE of Change of Address by Andrew J Schumacher (Schumacher, Andrew) |
| Filing 31 REPLY by non-party David Altstatt re #28 MOTION to Intervene filed by David Altstatt. (King, Bryan) |
| Filing 30 REPLY to Response to Motion re #28 MOTION to Intervene filed by Mitchco International, Inc.. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 29 RESPONSE to Motion re #28 MOTION to Intervene filed by United States of America. (Maule, Scott) |
| Filing 28 MOTION to Intervene by David Altstatt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Complaint)(King, Bryan) |
| Filing 27 ENTRY of Appearance by Dane H Miller on behalf of David Altstatt (Miller, Dane) |
| Filing 26 ENTRY of Appearance by Bryan N B King on behalf of David Altstatt (King, Bryan) |
| Filing 25 REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by United States of America. (Maule, Scott) |
| Filing 24 REPLY by Intervenor Defendant Mitchco International, Inc. re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Mitchco International, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Mitchco International, Inc.. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by State of Oklahoma. (Schumacher, Andrew) |
Filing 22
ORDER granting #21 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff shall file any response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 14] no later than February 4, 2022. Signed by Judge Scott L. Palk on 01/28/2022. (km)
|
| Filing 21 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by State of Oklahoma. (Schumacher, Andrew) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Mitchco International, Inc.'s Response to Government's Motion to Dismiss filed by Mitchco International, Inc.. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Intervene and Brief in Support of Mitchco International, Inc. Reply in Support of Mitchco International, Inc.'s Motion to Intervene filed by Mitchco International, Inc.. (Kane, Matthew) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #17 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene, #9 MOTION to Intervene and Brief in Support of Mitchco International, Inc. Replies due by 1/24/2022. Signed by Judge Scott L. Palk on 1/19/22. (md)
|
| Filing 17 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene by Mitchco International, Inc.. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Intervene and Brief in Support of Mitchco International, Inc. filed by United States of America. (Johnson, Amanda) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Intervene and Brief in Support of Mitchco International, Inc. filed by State of Oklahoma. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schumacher, Andrew) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by United States of America. (Maule, Scott) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF RELATED OR COMPANION CASE by United States of America (Maule, Scott) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by Scott A Maule on behalf of United States of America (Maule, Scott) |
| Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Amanda R Johnson on behalf of United States of America (Johnson, Amanda) |
| Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Grant E Moak on behalf of State of Oklahoma (Moak, Grant) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Intervene and Brief in Support of Mitchco International, Inc. by Mitchco International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - ODRS Complaint v USDept of Army, Fort Sill, #2 Exhibit 2 - Opinion & Order - OK v US Fed Cl 2019, #3 Exhibit 3 - Motion to Consolidate, #4 Exhibit 4 - Mitchco Answer & Cross-Claim, #5 Exhibit 5 - Slaughter Order, #6 Exhibit 6 - Order Granting Motion to Intervene)(Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Matthew C Kane on behalf of Mitchco International, Inc. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Andrew J Schumacher on behalf of State of Oklahoma (Schumacher, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by State of Oklahoma. United States of America served on 11/15/2021. (Schumacher, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by State of Oklahoma. United States of America served on 11/8/2021. (Schumacher, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Scott L. Palk for all further proceedings. Judge Stephen P. Friot no longer assigned to case. Entered at the direction of Judge Stephen P. Friot on 11/9/2021. (llg) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Peter A Nolan on behalf of State of Oklahoma (Nolan, Peter) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3794803. (Schumacher, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to United States of America. (dtb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by State of Oklahoma. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
