Desmet v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Anthony Clarence Desmet |
Scottsdale Insurance Company |
5:2021cv01081 |
November 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Bernard M Jones |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Action for Failure to State a Claim as Barred by Res Judicata filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Deligans, R) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Action for Failure to State a Claim as Barred by Res Judicata filed by Anthony Clarence Desmet. (Masterson, Michael) |
Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Scottsdale Insurance Company . (Deligans, R) |
Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Katherine Taylor Loy on behalf of Scottsdale Insurance Company (Loy, Katherine) |
Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Andrew M Gunn on behalf of Scottsdale Insurance Company (Gunn, Andrew) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Action for Failure to State a Claim as Barred by Res Judicata by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Deligans, R) |
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by R Ryan Deligans on behalf of Scottsdale Insurance Company (Deligans, R) |
Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Amy E Hampton on behalf of Anthony Clarence Desmet (Hampton, Amy) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael J Masterson on behalf of Anthony Clarence Desmet (Masterson, Michael) |
Filing 3 ENTER ORDER. Case reassigned to Judge Bernard M. Jones for all further proceedings. Judge Jodi W. Dishman no longer assigned to case. HEREAFTER, PLEASE REFER TO CASE AS: CIV-21-01081-J. Please note that for future filings in this case, the letter at the end of the number should now be a "J" rather than a(n) "JD." This is important to ensure the prompt distribution of pleadings to the proper judge. Entered at the direction of the Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 11/10/2021. (nv) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Scottsdale Insurance Company. (knt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scottsdale Insurance Company filed by Anthony Clarence Desmet. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - MSJ Order, #2 Exhibit 2 - Oct. 21 2021 Letter, #3 Exhibit 3 - Oct. 29 2021 Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(knt) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3796745. (Masterson, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Desmet v. Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Anthony Clarence Desmet | |
Represented By: | Amy E Hampton |
Represented By: | Michael J Masterson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Andrew M Gunn |
Represented By: | Katherine Taylor Loy |
Represented By: | R Ryan Deligans |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.