Stinnett v. Bismark Antonio Garcia et al
Plaintiff: Johnetta Stinnett
Defendant: Bismark Antonio Garcia doing business as B Garcia Truckin and Juan Infante
Case Number: 5:2021cv01105
Filed: November 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Jodi W Dishman
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying as moot #7 Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). Plaintiff's amendment "supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect." Thus, the Motion is moot. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 01/06/2022. (km)
January 3, 2022 Filing 17 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Defendants Bismark Antonio Garcia, Juan Infante. (Taremi, Mehry)
January 3, 2022 Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bismark Antonio Garcia, Juan Infante filed by Johnetta Stinnett.(Abel, Timothy)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Juan Infante, Bismark Antonio Garcia. Counsel for the parties are ORDERED to confer in good faith regarding the claims in this lawsuit and all arguments asserted in the Motion and associated briefs, within seven (7) days of this Order. Further deadlines are included in this Order. See Order for all details. Failure by either party to comply with this Order in good faith may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 12/14/2021. (knt)
December 9, 2021 Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by All Defendants. (Taremi, Mehry)
December 7, 2021 Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Johnetta Stinnett. (Abel, Timothy)
December 7, 2021 Filing 12 ENTER ORDER re #11 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Johnetta Stinnett. The response is STRICKEN due to counsel's inadvertent failure to redact all sensitive and personal information, specifically a date of birth. The Court of the Clerk is directed to seal Plaintiff's Response. [Doc. No. 11]. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to re-file the response with all appropriate redactions. Entered at the direction of the Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 12/07/2021. (nv)
December 7, 2021 Filing 11 STRICKEN RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Johnetta Stinnett. (Abel, Timothy)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 11/23/2021. (nv)
November 23, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 50, receipt number AOKWDC-3804041 by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1_Att'y PHV form)(Jones, Daniel)
November 23, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 50, receipt number AOKWDC-3804032 by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1_Att'y PHV Form)(Jones, Daniel) Modified on 11/23/2021 to remove "Motion to Add Party" event as the motion is a single Motion for PHV. (nv).
November 23, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by All Defendants. (Taremi, Mehry)
November 23, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by All Defendants.(Taremi, Mehry)
November 19, 2021 Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Johnetta Stinnett. (Abel, Timothy)
November 19, 2021 Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Timothy L Abel on behalf of Johnetta Stinnett (Abel, Timothy)
November 19, 2021 Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Mehry Taremi on behalf of All Defendants (Taremi, Mehry)
November 19, 2021 Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Daniel K Jones on behalf of All Defendants (Jones, Daniel)
November 19, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-2021-4421 filed by Bismark Antonio Garcia, Juan Infante. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - OSCN Docket Summary, #2 Exhibit 2 - Petition, #3 Exhibit 3 - Summons Returned Defendant Garcia, #4 Exhibit 4 - Summons Returned Defendant Infante, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt)
November 19, 2021 PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3802364. (Taremi, Mehry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stinnett v. Bismark Antonio Garcia et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnetta Stinnett
Represented By: Timothy L Abel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bismark Antonio Garcia doing business as B Garcia Truckin
Represented By: Daniel K Jones
Represented By: Mehry Taremi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Juan Infante
Represented By: Daniel K Jones
Represented By: Mehry Taremi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?