Robertson v. The United States of America
| Charles W Robertson |
| The United States of America |
| 5:2021cv01134 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Jodi W Dishman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a), and in accordance with the Court's Order issued this date, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 01/28/2022. (nv)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER. The Court finds that Plaintiff's Complaint is factually frivolous. Accordingly, under 1915(e)(2), the Court sua sponte dismisses #1 Plaintiff's Complaint. See order for full details. Signed by Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 01/28/2022. (nv)
|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to The United States of America. (km) |
| Filing 6 PRO SE LITIGANT'S REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF 1 SUMMONS(ES) by Charles W Robertson. (km) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 12/8/2021. (rb)
|
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles W Robertson Motion referred to Amanda Maxfield Green. Entered at the direction of Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 12/03/2021. (knt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to file Document Conventionally by Charles W Robertson. (knt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles W Robertson. (knt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The United States of America filed by Charles W Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Notice of Denial of Claim, #2 Attachment 2 - Summary, #3 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit One Cover Page, #4 Exhibit 2 - Letter of Documentation, #5 Exhibit 3 - April 2021 Letter re Legal Representation, #6 Exhibit 4 - May 25, 2021 Letter from Oklahoma Attorney General, #7 Exhibit 5 - February 26, 2018 Letter of Documentation, #8 Exhibit 6 - Wikipedia Article: Thermographic Camera, #9 Exhibit 7 - Wikipedia Article: Thermography, #10 Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia Article: Plutonium, #11 Exhibit 9 - Wikipedia Article: Transponder, #12 Exhibit 10 - Wikipedia Article: Microwave, #13 Exhibit 11 - Wikipedia Article: Electromagnetic Radiation, #14 Exhibit 12 - Wikipedia Article: Electromagnetic Field, #15 Exhibit 13 - Wikipedia Article: Ionization, #16 Exhibit 14 - Wikipedia Article: Ionizing Radiation, #17 Exhibit 15 - Wikipedia Article: X-Ray, #18 Civil Cover Sheet)(knt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robertson v. The United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles W Robertson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
