Buchanan v. USI Industrial Services Inc et al
Dorothy Buchanan |
USI Industrial Services Inc, Capital Electric Construction Company Inc, Capital Electric Line Builders Inc, MDU Resources Group Inc, MDU Construction Services Group Inc, MDU United Construction Solutions Inc, Brian Sellars and Kayla Murphy |
5:2021cv01153 |
December 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Robin J Cauthron |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 626 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Shannon C Haupt on behalf of Dorothy Buchanan (Haupt, Shannon) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Jana Beth Leonard on behalf of Dorothy Buchanan (Leonard, Jana) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Capital Electric Construction Company Inc, Capital Electric Line Builders Inc, Kayla Murphy, Brian Sellars, USI Industrial Services Inc. (kah) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3813125. (Leonard, Jana) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital Electric Construction Company Inc, Capital Electric Line Builders Inc, MDU Construction Services Group Inc, MDU Resources Group Inc, MDU United Construction Solutions Inc, Kayla Murphy, Brian Sellars, USI Industrial Services Inc filed by Dorothy Buchanan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.