Eden v. Stoker et al
Plaintiff: Charles W Eden
Defendant: Kathy Stoker and Terry Ingmire
Case Number: 5:2022cv00095
Filed: February 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Suzanne Mitchell
Referring Judge: Scott L Palk
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles W Eden, #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles W Eden. The undersigned recommends the Court deny Plaintiff's in forma pauperis motion. The undersigned further recommends dismissal without prejudice of this action unless Plaintiff pays the filing fee in full to the Clerk of Court within twenty-one days of any order adopting this Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 4/13/2022. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues and terminates the referral to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 3/23/22. (lb)
March 16, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles W Eden. Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER to Cure Deficiency regarding #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must cure these deficiencies by 3/25/22. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 3/4/22. (lb)
February 28, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles W Eden. Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to Cure Deficiency by 2/24/22. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 2/3/22. (lb)
February 2, 2022 Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell.. Entered at the direction of Judge Scott L. Palk on 02/02/22. (rr)
February 2, 2022 Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Scott L. Palk for all further proceedings. Judge Charles Goodwin no longer assigned to case. Entered at the direction of Judge Charles Goodwin on 02/02/22. (rr)
February 2, 2022 Filing 3 PREVIOUS Cases (rr)
February 1, 2022 Filing 2 LETTER from Charles W Eden (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rr)
February 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Terry Ingmire, Kathy Stoker filed by Charles W Eden. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eden v. Stoker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles W Eden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathy Stoker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry Ingmire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?