Farley v. James Crabtree Correctional Center et al
| Michael Ross Farley |
| James Crabtree Correctional Center, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Scott Nunn |
| 5:2022cv00150 |
| February 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Suzanne Mitchell |
| Scott L Palk |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell. Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. Signed by the direction of Judge Scott L. Palk on 02/18/2022. (jjs) |
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Scott L. Palk for all further proceedings. Judge Charles Goodwin no longer assigned to case. Signed at the direction of Judge Charles Goodwin on 02/18/2022. (jjs) |
| Filing 3 PREVIOUS Cases (jjs) |
| Notice of Mailing: Mailed #1 Complaint, #4 Enter Order, #5 Enter Order and LCvR5.4/Change of Address form to Michael Ross Farley #719520 HELENA-JCCC 216 N. Murray St. Helena, OK 73741-9606 (jjs) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Ross Farley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jjs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michael Ross Farley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Request to Staff, #2 Envelope)(jjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
