Liebeck v. American Phoenix Inc
Plaintiff: Antony Liebeck
Defendant: American Phoenix Inc
Case Number: 5:2022cv00153
Filed: February 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Patrick R Wyrick
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by American Phoenix Inc . (Bragalone, Robert)
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENTER ORDER (Text Only) - A review of the filings in this case reveals that Defendant American Phoenix Inc. has not filed a Corporate Disclosure Statement in compliance with Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the Court hereby DIRECTS Defendant American Phoenix Inc. to file within 7 days of this order its Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, using the form available on the Court's website (http://www.okwd.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/Corporate_Disclosure_Form.pdf). (This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this entry). Signed by Judge Patrick R Wyrick on 4/14/2022. (ks)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MAY STATUS & SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET: Scheduling Conference set for 5/3/2022 10:10 AM in Chambers before Judge Patrick R Wyrick. Status Report due by 4/26/2022. (ks)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert A Bragalone on behalf of American Phoenix Inc (Bragalone, Robert)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by American Phoenix Inc.(Bragalone, Robert)
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Antony Liebeck. American Phoenix Inc served on 2/25/2022. (Hurst, Amber)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Mark E Hammons on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hammons, Mark)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Brandon D Roberts on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Roberts, Brandon)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Amber L Hurst on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hurst, Amber)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3855228. (Hurst, Amber)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to American Phoenix Inc. (dtb)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Phoenix Inc filed by Antony Liebeck. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liebeck v. American Phoenix Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antony Liebeck
Represented By: Amber L Hurst
Represented By: Mark E Hammons
Represented By: Brandon D Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Phoenix Inc
Represented By: Robert A Bragalone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?