Giles v. Tops Holdco LLC et al
Rick Giles |
Total Operations & Production Services, Tops Holdco LLC and Tops LLC |
5:2022cv00211 |
March 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Joe Heaton |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions in limine due 03/15/2023; Jury instructions due 03/15/2023; Voir dire requests due 03/15/2023; Trial briefs due 03/15/2023; ADR Completion Date due by 11/1/2022. Discovery due by 1/1/2023. Jury Trial set on the court's 04/2023 trial docket in Courtroom 501 before Judge Joe Heaton. Motions due by 1/15/2023. Pretrial Report due by 3/15/2023. Signed by Judge Joe Heaton on 04/27/2022. (lam) |
Filing 17 ORDER striking the 05/04/2022 scheduling conference...initial disclosures are due by 06/01/2022; medication is ordered by 11/01/2022...separate scheduling to be entered. Signed by Judge Joe Heaton on 04/27/2022. (lam) |
Filing 16 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN by Plaintiff Rick Giles. (Hurst, Amber) |
Filing 15 CIVIL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET: Scheduling Conference set for 05/04/2022 @ 10:10 AM in Chambers before Judge Joe Heaton. Joint Status Report and Joint Discovery Plan due by 04/25/2022. (lam) |
Filing 14 ENTRY of Appearance by George Drennan on behalf of All Defendants (Drennan, George) |
Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Martin J Regimbal on behalf of Tops Holdco LLC, Total Operations & Production Services (Regimbal, Martin) |
Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by All Defendants . (Bruce, Philip) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by All Defendants.(Bruce, Philip) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 and #9 motions for admission pro hac vice of Martin Regimbal, Esq., and George Drennan, Esq., as counsel for defendants. Signed by Judge Joe Heaton on 03/21/2022. (lam) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of George C. Drennan Filing fee $ 50, receipt number AOKWDC-3871044 by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Request for Admission PHV of George C. Drennan)(Bruce, Philip) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Martin J. Regimbal Filing fee $ 50, receipt number AOKWDC-3871038 by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Request for Admission PHV of Martin J. Regimbal)(Bruce, Philip) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Mark E Hammons on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hammons, Mark) |
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Brandon D Roberts on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Roberts, Brandon) |
Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by All Plaintiffs. (Hurst, Amber) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Amber L Hurst on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hurst, Amber) |
Filing 3 ENTER ORDER counsel for the parties are directed to file their entries of appearance not later than 03/18/2022. Signed by Judge Joe Heaton on 03/16/2022. (lam) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Philip R Bruce on behalf of All Defendants (Bruce, Philip) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3869373. (Bruce, Philip) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-2022-762 filed by Total Operations & Production Services, Tops Holdco LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Petition, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - OSCN Case Details, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.