Roe v. University of Central Oklahoma
| Jane Roe |
| University of Central Oklahoma |
| 5:2022cv00237 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Scott L Palk |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 TELEPHONIC STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET: Scheduling Conference set for 6/9/2022 09:45 AM before Judge Scott L. Palk. Status Report due by 6/2/2022. (ms) |
| Filing 11 (Document Restricted)SEALED DOCUMENT by Jane Roe Re: #10 Order on Motion for Leave to,,, (Haddock, Sheila) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Under a Pseudonym and for Protective Order. Plaintiff and the accused student may proceed under pseudonyms in this action. When filing any publicly accessible (i.e. non-sealed or non-restricted) pleadings or documents, filers shall use the pseudonyms Jane Roe in place of Plaintiffs actual name and John Doe in place of the accused students actual name and shall not include any personally identifying information of Plaintiff or the accused student. Further, Plaintiff is directed to file under seal a disclosure statement providing her true identity and the true identity of John Doe within five days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Scott L. Palk on 5/2/22. (ms)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by University of Central Oklahoma.(Coffey, Dixie) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Roe. University of Central Oklahoma served on 3/24/2022. (Haddock, Sheila) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Jessica A Wilkes on behalf of University of Central Oklahoma (Wilkes, Jessica) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Dixie L Coffey on behalf of University of Central Oklahoma (Coffey, Dixie) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel. Signed by Judge Scott L. Palk on 3/24/22. (ms)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed without Local Counsel by Jane Roe. (Haddock, Sheila) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under a Pseduonym by Jane Roe. (Haddock, Sheila) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to University of Central Oklahoma. (rr) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3872806. (Haddock, Sheila) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against University of Central Oklahoma filed by Jane Roe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roe v. University of Central Oklahoma | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jane Roe | |
| Represented By: | Sheila P Haddock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: University of Central Oklahoma | |
| Represented By: | Dixie L Coffey |
| Represented By: | Jessica A Wilkes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
