Smith v. El Reno City of et al
| Anthony J Smith |
| El Reno City of, Matt Sandidge, Kent Lagaly, Kamie Brookshire and John Cochran |
| 5:2022cv00253 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Bernard M Jones |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER ~ Granting #20 Unopposed Motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants' answer or response is due on or before May 31, 2022. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 5/18/2022. (dwl)
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Motion Under Rule 12 by Kamie Brookshire, Kent Lagaly, Matt Sandidge. (Love, John) |
| Filing 19 ENTRY of Appearance by John J Love on behalf of Kamie Brookshire, Kent Lagaly, Matt Sandidge (Love, John) |
| Filing 18 ENTRY of Appearance by Margaret McMorrow-Love on behalf of Kamie Brookshire, Kent Lagaly, Matt Sandidge (McMorrow-Love, Margaret) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER ~ Denying as Moot #12 DefendantCochran's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 5/17/2022. (dwl)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE (other) by Anthony J Smith of Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Defendant John Cochran Only (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony J Smith. Kamie Brookshire served on 4/28/2022. (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony J Smith. Kent Lagaly served on 4/28/2022. (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony J Smith. Matt Sandidge served on 4/28/2022. (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by John Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Unpublished decision in Lindsey v. Brinker Intern. Payroll Co., LP, #2 Exhibit 2 Unpublished decision in Johnson v. State of Okla., ex rel. Okla. Dept of Veterans Affairs, #3 Exhibit 3 Unpublished decision in Benavides v. City of Oklahoma City, #4 Exhibit 4 Unpublished decision in Benton v. Belk, Inc., #5 Exhibit 5 Unpublished decision in McKinzie v. Sprint/United Management Co.)(Levine, Alison) |
| Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Alison L Levine on behalf of John Cochran (Levine, Alison) |
| Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Stephen L Geries on behalf of John Cochran (Geries, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by El Reno City of.(Love, John) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Margaret McMorrow-Love on behalf of El Reno City of (McMorrow-Love, Margaret) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by John J Love on behalf of El Reno City of (Love, John) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony J Smith. John Cochran served on 3/31/2022. (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony J Smith. El Reno City of served on 3/31/2022. (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Shannon C Haupt on behalf of Anthony J Smith (Haupt, Shannon) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Jana Beth Leonard on behalf of Anthony J Smith (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Kamie Brookshire, John Cochran, El Reno City of, Kent Lagaly, Matt Sandidge. (km) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3876944. (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kamie Brookshire, John Cochran, El Reno City of, Kent Lagaly, Matt Sandidge filed by Anthony J Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(km) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
