Clark v. Crow
| Lynn Clark, II |
| Scott Crow |
| 5:2022cv00296 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Shon T Erwin |
| Bernard M Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- it is recommended that the Court dismiss the Petition as untimely. This Report and Recommendation terminates the referral by the District Judge in this matter. Objections to R&R due by 6/2/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 5/16/2022. (mc) |
| Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
Filing 7
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ~ The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation #5 and DENIES Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 . Additionally, since Petitioner has paid the $5.00 filing fee, the Court rerefers this matter to Magistrate Judge Erwin for proceedings as outlined in the Court's earlier referral. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 4/25/2022. (dwl)
|
| Filing 6 Receipt for Money Received from Lynn Clark, II in the amount of $5.00, receipt number OKW500090092 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Receipt mailed to: Lynn Clark, II #683581 HOLDENVILLE-DCF 6888 E 133rd Rd Holdenville, OK 74848-9033. (km) |
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- Having reviewed said motion, the undersigned finds that Petitioner has sufficient funds in his inmate savings account to prepay the filing fee of $5.00. It is recommended that Petitioner's motion ECF No. #2 be DENIED and that Petitioner be ordered to prepay the full $5.00 filing fee for this action to proceed. This report and recommendation terminates the referral to the undersigned magistrate judge unless and until the matter is re-referred. Objections to R&R due by 4/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 4/8/2022. (mc)
|
| Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. Entered at the direction of Judge Bernard M. Jones on 04/07/2022. (km)
|
| Filing 3 NO PREVIOUS Cases. (km) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lynn Clark, II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Offender Statement Report, #2 Exhibit 2 - Inmate Account Summary, #3 Envelope)(km) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lynn Clark, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(km) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clark v. Crow | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lynn Clark, II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Scott Crow | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
