Giles v. Pfizer Inc et al
Timothy Giles |
Pfizer Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Proctor and Gamble Inc and Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc |
5:2022cv00456 |
June 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Timothy D DeGiusti |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Daniel M Delluomo on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Delluomo, Daniel) |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti for all further proceedings. Judge Robin J. Cauthron no longer assigned to case. Entered at the direction of Judge Robin J. Cauthron on 06/07/22. (wh) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Robin J. Cauthron on 06/07/22. (wh) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. (Fischer, Amy) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Amy Sherry Fischer on behalf of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (Fischer, Amy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from The District Court of Comanche County, case number CJ-2022-218 filed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Petition, #2 Exhibit 2- Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit 3- Transfer Order, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3921372. (Fischer, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.