Frogge v. City of Bethany et al
| Michael C Frogge |
| City of Bethany, Bethany Police Department, Detective Angelo Orifice, Detective Brady Schmeideberg and Chief John Reid |
| 5:2022cv00692 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Joe Heaton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion to Dismiss by City of Bethany. (Dark, Jessica) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT Second against All Defendants filed by Michael C Frogge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit N)(Pointon, Gina) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by Chief John Reid. (Dark, Jessica) |
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 defendants Detective Angelo Orefice and Detective Brady Schmiedeberg's unopposed motion for extension of deadline...the referenced defendants shall file their answer or other responsive pleading to plaintiff's amended complaint #4 not later than 09/29/2022. Signed by Judge Joe Heaton on 09/15/2022. (lam)
|
| Filing 16 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading to First Amended Complaint by Detective Angelo Orifice, Detective Brady Schmeideberg. (Dark, Jessica) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by City of Bethany. (Dark, Jessica) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by Bethany Police Department. (Dark, Jessica) |
| Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Jessica L Dark on behalf of Bethany Police Department, City of Bethany, Detective Angelo Orifice, Chief John Reid, Detective Brady Schmeideberg (Dark, Jessica) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert S Lafferrandre on behalf of Bethany Police Department, City of Bethany, Detective Angelo Orifice, Chief John Reid, Detective Brady Schmeideberg (Lafferrandre, Robert) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael C Frogge. Detective Brady Schmeideberg served on 8/31/2022. (Pointon, Gina) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael C Frogge. Chief John Reid served on 8/31/2022. (Pointon, Gina) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael C Frogge. City of Bethany served on 8/31/2022. (Pointon, Gina) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael C Frogge. Bethany Police Department served on 8/31/2022. (Pointon, Gina) |
| Filing 7 SUBPOENA Returned Executed by Michael C Frogge as to Bethany Police Department. (Pointon, Gina) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael C Frogge. Detective Angelo Orifice served on 8/31/2022. (Pointon, Gina) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Bethany Police Department, City of Bethany, Detective Angelo Orifice, Chief John Reid, Detective Brady Schmeideberg. (rr) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST against Michael C Frogge filed by Michael C Frogge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IIndex of Exhibits with exhibits)(Pointon, Gina) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Gina V Pointon on behalf of Michael C Frogge (Pointon, Gina) |
|
Filing 2
ENTER ORDER directing counsel for plaintiff to file an entry of appearance not later than 08/17/2022. Signed by Judge Joe Heaton on 08/15/2022. (lam)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michael C Frogge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(so) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3969486. (Pointon, Gina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
