Hughey v. Aldi Inc
| Teresa Hughey |
| Aldi Inc |
| 5:2022cv00743 |
| August 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Jodi W Dishman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Eric A Urbach on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Urbach, Eric) |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Aldi Inc . (Cox, Clinton) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER : Motions in limine due 10/31/2023; Jury instructions due 10/31/2023; Voir dire requests due 10/31/2023; Trial briefs due 10/31/2023; Discovery due by 10/7/2022. Jury Trial set for 12/5/2023 09:00 AM in Courtroom 502 before Judge Jodi W. Dishman. Motions due by 8/1/2023. Pretrial Report due by 10/31/2023. See Order for all deadlines and details. Counsel should pay particular attention to numerical paragraph 24. Signed by Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 10/07/2022. (nv)
|
| Filing 10 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN by Defendant Aldi Inc. (Cox, Clinton) |
| Filing 9 CIVIL SCHEDULING/STATUS CONFERENCE DOCKET . Scheduling Conference set for 10/7/2022 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 502 before Judge Jodi W. Dishman. Status Report due by 9/30/2022. (nv) |
| Filing 8 ENTER ORDER. In light of the Amended Notice of Removal [Doc. No. 7], the Court's Show Cause Order [Doc. No. 3] is satisfied. Entered at the direction of the Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 08/29/2022. (nv) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Aldi Inc. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Original Petition, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Plaintiff's Application to Serve Defendant Out of Time, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Summons, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Order Granting Plaintiff's Application to Serve Defendant Out of Time, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 - Defendant Aldi, Inc's Answer to Plaintiff's Motion, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 - Motion to Enter on Non-Jury Docket, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7 - Court Docket)(Cox, Clinton) Modified on 8/29/2022; document title added to docket entry. (km) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Allison N Biscoe on behalf of Aldi Inc (Biscoe, Allison) (Main Document 6 replaced on 9/2/2022. Document flattened to optimize CM/ECF display; no other changes made.) (km) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Clinton V Cox, IV on behalf of Aldi Inc (Cox, Clinton) (Main Document 5 replaced on 9/2/2022. Document flattened to optimize CM/ECF display; no other changes made.) (km) |
| Filing 4 STRICKEN ENTRY of Appearance by Clinton V Cox, IV on behalf of Aldi Inc (Cox, Clinton) |
| NOTICE from the Court #4 Entry of Appearance, STRICKEN. The Entry of Appearance shows a different attorney name from the filing attorney account used. Counsel to refile. (nv) |
| Docket Annotation: In light of the #6 Entry of Appearance by Allison N. Biscoe, which lists counsel's firm address is in Weatherford, OK, the Court's #2 Enter Order re: LCvR83.3(a), (c) is satisfied. (nv) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE . The Court ORDERS the Defendant, Aldi, Inc., to show cause within 14 days, or by September 9, 2022, why this case should not be remanded back to the Oklahoma County District Court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Order for all details. Signed by Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 08/26/2022. (nv)
|
| Filing 2 ENTER ORDER. Defendant's counsel of record are Allison N. Biscoe and Clinton V. Cox, IV, whose offices are in Dallas, Texas. The Local Rules of this Court require non- resident attorneys who do not maintain an office in Oklahoma to associate with local counsel. LCvR83.3(a). Accordingly, counsel for Defendant are directed to comply with this rule or move the Court for relief under LCvR83.3(c) no later than September 9, 2022. Entered at the direction of the Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 08/26/2022. (nv) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Oklahoma County District Court, case number CJ-2021-2711 filed by Aldi Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Original Petition, #2 Exhibit 2 - Plaintiff's Application to Serve Defendant Out of Time, #3 Exhibit 3 - Summons, #4 Exhibit 4 - Order Granting Plaintiff's Application to Serve Defendant Out of Time, #5 Exhibit 5 - Defendant Aldi Inc's Answer to Plaintiff's Motion, #6 Exhibit 6 - Motion to Enter on Non-Jury Docket, #7 Exhibit 7 - Court Docket, #8 Attachment 1 - Index of Pleadings, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(km) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-3978505. (Cox, Clinton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hughey v. Aldi Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teresa Hughey | |
| Represented By: | Eric A Urbach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aldi Inc | |
| Represented By: | Allison N Biscoe |
| Represented By: | Clinton V Cox, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
