Ross v. Williams et al
| Bryan Ross |
| Greg Williams |
| 5:2022cv00920 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Shon T Erwin |
| David L Russell |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Court's Order entered this date, Plaintiff's action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge David L. Russell on 12/20/2022. (km)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER adopting #6 Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation concluded Plaintiff's action should be dismissed for failure to pay an initial partial filing fee as ordered. The record reflects that Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits therein, sought an extension of time in which to object or paid the initial partial filing fee. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation, and this matter is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge David L. Russell on 12/20/2022. (km)
|
|
Filing 6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- the undersigned hereby recommends that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the initial filing fee as ordered by the Court. This report and recommendation terminates the referral to the undersigned magistrate judge unless and until the matter is re-referred. Objections to R&R due by 12/9/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 11/22/2022. (mc)
|
| Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court finds Plaintiff is entitled to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee, and his Motion is granted. However, Plaintiff shall be required to pay the full $350.00 filing fee as set forth hereafter.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before November 14, 2022, Plaintiff pay an initial partial filing fee of $11.40. See Order as more fully set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 10/28/2022. (mc)
|
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. Signed by the direction of Judge David L. Russell on 10/25/2022. (ekw) |
| Filing 3 NO PREVIOUS Cases (ekw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bryan Ross. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Inmate Account Summary, #2 Envelope)(ekw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Greg Williams filed by Bryan Ross. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ekw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ross v. Williams et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bryan Ross | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Greg Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
