Millan v. Harpe
| Steven Harpe |
| Anthony Adams Millan |
| 5:2022cv00933 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Shon T Erwin |
| Joe Heaton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER FOR RESPONSE BY OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254 -- The Respondent shall file an answer responding to the allegations of the petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 12/21/2022. (mc)
|
|
Filing 7
Order petitioner has paid the filing fee... #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin is stricken as moot; this case is REFERRED to Judge Erwin for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Joe Heaton on 11/17/2022. (lam)
|
| Filing 6 Receipt for Money Received from Anthony Adams Millan in the amount of $5, receipt number OKW500092785 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Mailed to Anthony Adams Millan #855326 LAWTON-LCF 8607 SE Flower Mound Rd Lawton, OK 73501 (so) |
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- it is recommended that Petitioner's motion, ECF No. #2 be DENIED and that he be ordered to prepay the full $5.00 filing fee for this action to proceed. It is further recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice to re-filing unless Petitioner pays the $5.00 filing fee in full to the Clerk of the Court within twenty (20) days of any order adopting this Report and Recommendation. The referral to the undersigned Magistrate Judge is terminated unless and until the matter is re-referred. Objections to R&R due by 11/14/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 10/28/2022. (mc)
|
| Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. Signed by the direction of Judge Joe Heaton on 10/27/2022. (so) |
| Filing 3 NO PREVIOUS Cases (so) |
| Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, #1 , #2 , #4 , to Anthony Adams Millan #855326 LAWTON-LCF 8607 SE Flower Mound Rd Lawton, OK 73501 (so) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Adams Millan. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(so) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Anthony Adams Millan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(so) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Millan v. Harpe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Anthony Adams Millan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Steven Harpe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
